Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday September 20 2017, @02:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the brace-for-impact dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1937

Net neutrality advocates are planning two days of protest in Washington DC this month as they fight off plans to defang regulations meant to protect an open internet.

A coalition of activists, consumer groups and writers are calling on supporters to attend the next meeting of the Federal Communications Commission on 26 September in DC. The next day, the protest will move to Capitol Hill, where people will meet legislators to express their concerns about an FCC proposal to rewrite the rules governing the internet.

The FCC has received 22 million comments on "Restoring Internet Freedom", the regulator's proposal to dismantle net neutrality rules put in place in 2015. Opponents argue the rule changes, proposed by the FCC's Republican chairman Ajit Pai, will pave the way for a tiered internet where internet service providers (ISPs) will be free to pick and choose winners online by giving higher speeds to those they favor, or those willing or able to pay more.

The regulator has yet to process the comments, and is reviewing its proposals before a vote expected later this year.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/15/washington-dc-net-neutrality-protests-restoring-internet-freedom


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @09:42PM (8 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @09:42PM (#570859)

    Why the hell do you think so many people come to the US for treatment?

    Not GP, but to answer your question, look at the numbers, they don't. Comparatively, very few people come to the US for treatment. Although I do agree that the numbers are indicative of the quality of the US's health care system (spoiler: it sucks)

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @10:53PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @10:53PM (#570887)

    He doesn't care about facts, he only cares about propaganda. Dude is fucking dumb. All this same shit has been trotted out before, but he always returns to the same crap arguments that ignore reality. My guess is he just can't BELIEVE the US empire is falling so he's falling back on the comfortable and familiar dreams.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @12:09AM (6 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @12:09AM (#570917)

      So, all you got is ad hominem...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:26AM (5 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:26AM (#570979)

        It's not ad hominem to say someone doesn't care about the facts, and are kind of dumb, when they just made an easily checked and objectively false statement. To declare the US health care system is the best on the planet is patently false and not backed up by data. To rave about 'why do so many people come to the US for health care' when less then half the number of people go to the US as go to Iran is absurd. That the poster doesn't care about facts is not ad hominem, it's just a fact.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:28PM (4 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:28PM (#571219)

          The statement "Dude is fucking dumb" is ad hominem, and it is pathetically deceitful of you to try to claim otherwise. If the false statement is so easily checked and objectively demonstrated to be false, why not post THAT instead of a post that a third-grader would be ashamed of?

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @05:37PM (3 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @05:37PM (#571277)

            The original 'Dude is fucking dumb', wasn't me. But the only thing improper about the statement is the term 'fucking" and while it distracts from the point and is not helpful, it's not really ad-hominem.

            dumb
                          adj 1: slow to learn or understand; lacking intellectual acuity;
                                        "so dense he never understands anything I say to him";
                                        "never met anyone quite so dim"; "although dull at
                                        classical learning, at mathematics he was uncommonly
                                        quick"- Thackeray; "dumb officials make some really
                                        dumb decisions"; "he was either normally stupid or
                                        being deliberately obtuse"; "worked with the slow
                                        students" [syn: {dense}, {dim}, {dull}, {obtuse}, {slow}]

            I think that in this case, I'd give the benefit of the doubt and go with 'being deliberately obtuse' as the most accurate use of the term dumb. But i think 'dumb' is a perfectly valid word choice for someone who deliberately and repeatedly spouts obvious untruths. It's accurate, not ad-hominem.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @07:25PM (2 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @07:25PM (#571345)

              But i think 'dumb' is a perfectly valid word choice for someone who deliberately and repeatedly spouts obvious untruths. It's accurate, not ad-hominem.

              ad hominem [thefreedictionary.com]
              adj.
              1. Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument
              2. Appealing to the emotions rather than to logic or reason.

              True or not, attacking the person rather than the argument is ad hominem, and is an invalid debate tactic.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @10:42PM (1 child)

                by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @10:42PM (#571446)

                In retrospect, I have to agree. Calling the poster dumb was ad hominem, calling the action dumb would not have been.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 22 2017, @12:22AM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 22 2017, @12:22AM (#571487)

                  Whoa, wait, what? Listen, pal, that's not how it works around here. Once you've made a claim, you stick to it no matter what.

                  Seriously, though, I look forward to throwing more ideas around with you, AC, to see what bits break off whose ideas first. =)