SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the always-read-the-fine-print dept.
Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1937
Uber is fighting a proposed class-action lawsuit that says it secretly over charges riders and under pays drivers. In its defense, the ride-hailing service claims that nobody is being defrauded in its "upfront" rider fare pricing model.
The fares charged to riders don't have to match up with the fares paid to drivers, Uber said, because that's what a driver's "agreement" allows.
"Plaintiff's allegations are premised on the notion that, once Uber implemented Upfront Pricing for riders, it was required under the terms of the Agreement to change how the Fare was calculated for Drivers," Uber said (PDF) in a recent court filing seeking to have the class-action tossed. "This conclusion rests on a misinterpretation of the Agreement."
The suit claims that, when a rider uses Uber's app to hail a ride, the fare the app immediately shows the passenger is based on a slower and longer route compared to the one displayed to the driver. The rider pays the higher fee, and the driver's commission is paid from the cheaper, faster route, according to the lawsuit.
Uber claims the disparity between rider and driver fares "was hardly a secret."
"Drivers," Uber told a federal judge, "could have simply asked a User how much he or she paid for the trip to learn of any discrepancy."
(Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday September 20 2017, @07:39PM (3 children)
You need to watch the IT Crowd again. Specifically the first episode, and the scene where the IT worker gets the shit beaten out him till the "people person" intervenes.
Sometimes it is a good thing to have a person capable of speaking with normal people, being understood, and not causing the pitchforks and torches to come out :)
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday September 20 2017, @09:37PM (2 children)
GPP: "\forall x \in X, P(x) is true"
Me: "\exists x_f \in X : P(x_f) is false" is a counter argument to that argument
You: "\exists x_t \in X : P(x_t) is true" is neither a supporting argument for GPP, nor a counter to me.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by edIII on Friday September 22 2017, @02:08AM (1 child)
That's why I thought you thought otherwise and responded with my own movie/tv scene...
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday September 22 2017, @08:28AM
"X satisfy predicate Y" means *all* X satisfy predicate Y. One X that doesn't satisfy predicate Y is a counter-example, and all that's needed to disprove the initial statement. In this case, predicate Y was serving a purpose, and I identified a middleman that didn't serve a purpose.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves