Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1937
There's a bug in the widely used Apache Web Server that causes servers to leak pieces of arbitrary memory in a way that could expose passwords or other secrets, a freelance journalist has disclosed.
The vulnerability can be triggered by querying a server with what's known as an OPTIONS request. Like the better-known GET and POST requests, OPTIONS is a type of HTTP method that allows users to determine which HTTP requests are supported by the server. Normally, a server will respond with GET, POST, OPTIONS, and any other supported methods. Under certain conditions, however, responses from Apache Web Server include the data stored in computer memory. Patches are available here and here.
[...] Optionsbleed, by contrast [to Heartbleed], doesn't pose as big a threat, but its effects can still be damaging. The risk is highest for server hosts that allow more than one customer to share a single machine. That's because Optionsbleed allows customers to exploit the flaw in a way that exposes secret data from other customers' hosts on the same system. On the Internet at large, the threat is less serious.
[...] Interestingly, the bug was first identified in 2014. Why it's only now being patched is unclear.
[Note: I checked with TheMightyBuzzard, and was informed that, though SoylentNews does run Apache, our systems are configured in such a way as to not expose OPTIONS. In other words, it is believed that we are not susceptible. --martyb]
(Score: 4, Informative) by NotSanguine on Thursday September 21 2017, @02:07PM (2 children)
Details are available at CVE-2017-9798 [nist.gov].
The link above contains more links to:
Patch: https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/29afdd2550b3d30a8defece2b95ae81edcf66ac9 [github.com]
POC exploit: https://github.com/hannob/optionsbleed [github.com]
any many other goodies.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @08:56PM (1 child)
The "POC exploit" link is jsut a POC tester, it identifies vulnerable hosts doesn't exploit the vulnerability on them. (at least according to the README...)
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Thursday September 21 2017, @09:08PM
Yeah, I realized that after I posted the comment. Mea Culpa.
You can find an actual exploit at: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42745/ [exploit-db.com]
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr