Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday September 21 2017, @11:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the bleeding-to-death dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1937

There's a bug in the widely used Apache Web Server that causes servers to leak pieces of arbitrary memory in a way that could expose passwords or other secrets, a freelance journalist has disclosed.

The vulnerability can be triggered by querying a server with what's known as an OPTIONS request. Like the better-known GET and POST requests, OPTIONS is a type of HTTP method that allows users to determine which HTTP requests are supported by the server. Normally, a server will respond with GET, POST, OPTIONS, and any other supported methods. Under certain conditions, however, responses from Apache Web Server include the data stored in computer memory. Patches are available here and here.

[...] Optionsbleed, by contrast [to Heartbleed], doesn't pose as big a threat, but its effects can still be damaging. The risk is highest for server hosts that allow more than one customer to share a single machine. That's because Optionsbleed allows customers to exploit the flaw in a way that exposes secret data from other customers' hosts on the same system. On the Internet at large, the threat is less serious.

[...] Interestingly, the bug was first identified in 2014. Why it's only now being patched is unclear.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/09/apache-bug-leaks-contents-of-server-memory-for-all-to-see-patch-now/

[Note: I checked with TheMightyBuzzard, and was informed that, though SoylentNews does run Apache, our systems are configured in such a way as to not expose OPTIONS. In other words, it is believed that we are not susceptible. --martyb]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:01PM (2 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:01PM (#571201) Journal

    [Note: I checked with TheMightyBuzzard, and was informed that, though SoylentNews does run Apache, our systems are configured in such a way as to not expose OPTIONS. In other words, it is believed that we are not susceptible. --martyb]

    Yeah, but do you have a security.txt file? :-)

    The fact that you, last time I checked, get a grade of A+ on SSLLabs, demonstrates significant effort in the care of the website.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday September 21 2017, @09:02PM (1 child)

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday September 21 2017, @09:02PM (#571402)

    Small places with motivated security teams tend to feel safer than huge organizations.

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday September 22 2017, @03:15PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 22 2017, @03:15PM (#571665) Journal

      Wot? Surely you are not suggesting lapses in how big companies deal with web sites? Like Microsoft letting the microsoft.com domain expire?

      --
      To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.