SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A new study of a Neanderthal child's skeleton has suggested that Neanderthal brains developed more slowly than previous studies had indicated:
A new study shows that Neanderthal brains developed more slowly than ours. An analysis of a Neanderthal child's skeleton suggests that its brain was still developing at a time when the brains of modern human children are fully formed. This is further evidence that this now extinct human was not more brutish and primitive than our species. The research has been published in the journal Science.
Until now it had been thought that we were the only species whose brains develop slowly. Unlike other apes and more primitive humans modern humans have an extended period of childhood lasting several years. This is because it takes time and energy to develop our large brain. Previous studies of Neanderthal remains indicated that they developed more quickly than modern humans - suggesting that their brains might be less sophisticated.
But a team led by Prof Antonio Rosas of the Museum of Natural Sciences in Madrid found that if anything, Neanderthal brains may develop more slowly than ours. "It was a surprise," he told BBC News. "When we started the study we were expecting something similar to the previous studies," he told BBC News.
Also at Science Magazine, NYT, and Discover Magazine.
The growth pattern of Neandertals, reconstructed from a juvenile skeleton from El Sidrón (Spain) (open, DOI: 10.1126/science.aan6463) (DX)
(Score: 2) by bart9h on Sunday September 24 2017, @01:06AM (1 child)
They haven't "died out". They were driven to extinction by the invasion of the Sapiens.
The tribes at the time were only around 100 to 150 strong. One theory says that the Sapiens developed a more abstract language first, and that allowed them to coordinate larger groups of people.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday September 24 2017, @03:37AM
quote>They haven't "died out". They were driven to extinction by the invasion of the Sapiens.
A distinction without a difference.
They couldn't compete or chose not to, or they had genes that became recessive in interbreeding. There's no end of theories.
There's not a lot of evidence for inter species warfare. If anything they were probably "inter-bred to extinction".
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.