Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday June 04 2014, @01:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the hurricane-named-sue dept.

A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) found that

Feminine-named hurricanes (vs. masculine-named hurricanes) cause significantly more deaths, apparently because they lead to lower perceived risk and consequently less preparedness. Using names such as Eloise or Charlie for referencing hurricanes has been thought by meteorologists to enhance the clarity and recall of storm information. We show that this practice also taps into well-developed and widely held gender stereotypes, with potentially deadly consequences. Implications are discussed for understanding and shaping human responses to natural hazard warnings.

Some information beyond the abstract is available with commentary at the Washington Post.

Personally, I agree with the blogger who suggested using villain names from fiction as hurricane names to convince people to take them seriously.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by the_olo on Wednesday June 04 2014, @10:36AM

    by the_olo (1764) on Wednesday June 04 2014, @10:36AM (#51010) Homepage

    Looking forward to Category 5 [wikipedia.org] hurricanes "Morgoth" and "Cthulhu".

    On the other hand, not so anxious about Category 1 "Sprinkles" and "Mopsy"...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2