Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-boldy-go? dept.

CBS premiered its new Star Trek series "Discovery" on Sunday. The first episode was made available on OTA (over-the-air) CBS stations — but it and all subsequent episodes are available strictly on CBS's All Access streaming service. Cost is $6/month with ads, $10/month ad-free. (NOTE: The second episode was made available immediately after episode 1 aired. Episodes 3-7 will be released weekly, there will be a break, and then the remaining episodes will again be released weekly early in 2018.)

Ars Technica has a review that mostly praised the new show. (There were at least two technical inaccuracies in the review concerning the first episode.)

For those who may not yet have seen it, I kindly ask folks who comment on this story to make liberal use of the <spoiler>don't show this unless they click here</spoiler> tags.

What did you think? Was it entertaining? Did it hold closely [enough] to existing Star Trek canon? Was any 'ideology' change you saw sufficiently warranted?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:39PM (13 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:39PM (#573290)

    So how did that Wezlee fellow end up in Star Fleet? How did Kneelix end up in Star Fleet? Are you saying they achieved their Star Fleet ranks based on merit?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:52PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:52PM (#573305)

    With Netflix, I've been able to watch these series one-show-after-the-other in a single sitting, plowing through entire series. I recall seeing these characters work their way up, and thereby become respected members of the team. Neelix was a non-Starfleet member.

    In the case of Wesley, he was ultimately treated as a very gifted individual; it's not surprising that his path was different from "normal" people.

    With Neelix, he did indeed face a lot of prejudice, and had to prove himself by arduously learning things on his own, and taking on tasks that people didn't want to do.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:58PM (6 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:58PM (#573314)

      Neelix was a non-Starfleet member.

      Wrong! WRONG! WRONG!

      "Captain Janeway bestows on Neelix the title of Official Starfleet Ambassador to the Delta Quadrant." [wikipedia.org]

      He holds a higher rank than most of the crew on the Voyager ship. Starfleet Ambassadors reportedly have a rank that's considered equivalent to that of captains, and they can be ranked higher than captains at the discretion of the admiralty.

      • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:01PM (5 children)

        by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:01PM (#573322)

        "Homestead" is the 169th episode of Star Trek: Voyager and the 23rd episode of the seventh season. One of the final episodes of the series, it marks the departure of Neelix from the crew of the Starship Voyager.

        Holy selective quoting, Batman!

        So he was given an honorary position RIGHT BEFORE he left.

        --
        "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:06PM (4 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:06PM (#573327)

          Goddamn it, it's not an "honorary position"! Neelix is the Official Starfleet Ambassador to the Delta Quadrant! Show him some respect, damn it!

          • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:10PM (3 children)

            by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:10PM (#573333)

            Considering the nearest Starfleet presence to him is a couple decades away at warp speed, I might as well declare myself King of Proxima Centauri, for all the good it'll do.

            --
            "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:16PM (2 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:16PM (#573340)

              What part of Official Starfleet Ambassador to the Delta Quadrant do you not understand?

              • (Score: 2, Touché) by tangomargarine on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:42PM

                by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:42PM (#573372)

                How it means anything

                --
                "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @07:00PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @07:00PM (#573385)

                *sigh*
                And what right does a Captain have to make an ambassador.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by tangomargarine on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:59PM (4 children)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:59PM (#573315)

    How did Kneelix end up in Star Fleet?

    Neelix was a special case, as they were stuck in the middle of nowhere and needed a guide. Also I don't think he was ever officially part of Starfleet, either. He was a cook, counselor, and ambassador of sorts.

    Tom Paris was given a field commission in that show, too, and it sounded pretty doubtful he would've been given that second chance normally, as he was a felon.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday September 27 2017, @03:57AM (3 children)

      by dry (223) on Wednesday September 27 2017, @03:57AM (#573656) Journal

      Do you really think that they'll have feudal things like felons? Even in the 21st (and at least a good chunk of the 20th) only 2 countries still have felons.

      • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday September 27 2017, @02:20PM (2 children)

        by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday September 27 2017, @02:20PM (#573806)

        Even in the 21st (and at least a good chunk of the 20th) only 2 countries still have felons.

        What? I'm confused what you're talking about.

        fel·on1
        ˈfelən/Submit
        noun
        1.
        a person who has been convicted of a felony.

        fel·o·ny
        ˈfelənē/Submit
        noun
        a crime, typically one involving violence, regarded as more serious than a misdemeanor, and usually punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or by death.

        http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Punishment/Maximum-length-of-sentence [nationmaster.com]

        From that link it looks like only about a bazillion countries have prison sentences longer than a year for *some* crime.

        --
        "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
        • (Score: 2) by dry on Saturday September 30 2017, @02:56AM (1 child)

          by dry (223) on Saturday September 30 2017, @02:56AM (#575170) Journal

          Sorry for not replying sooner.
          I'm thinking more of the legal definition, basically a class of people who have their rights permanently, or close enough, curtailed. Not its use in culture, which is mostly American culture where it is used.
          eg, being a felon in America means,

          The consequences felons face in most states include:[22]

                  Disenfranchisement (expressly permitted by the Fourteenth Amendment, as noted by the Supreme Court)[23]
                  Exclusion from obtaining certain licenses, such as a visa, or professional licenses required to legally operate (making some vocations off-limits to felons)
                  Exclusion from purchase and possession of firearms, ammunition, and body armor
                  Ineligibility to serve on a jury
                  Ineligibility for government assistance or welfare, including being barred from federally funded housing
                  Removal (deportation) (if not a citizen)

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony [wikipedia.org]

          In most of the free world, serving your sentence means that you are once again a regular citizen and most of those rights have to be removed by a Judge as part of sentencing rather then as a letter of attainment passed by the legislature. Here, restrictions on firearms, only happens if a Judge says, usually due to being stupid with a firearm. Put on a sex list, only if a Judge considers the crime deserving of it. Most of those others seem barbaric though deportation is pretty usual for non-citizens.

          • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday October 02 2017, @02:56PM

            by tangomargarine (667) on Monday October 02 2017, @02:56PM (#575914)

            Aha. Okay that makes more sense.

            --
            "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"