Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-boldy-go? dept.

CBS premiered its new Star Trek series "Discovery" on Sunday. The first episode was made available on OTA (over-the-air) CBS stations — but it and all subsequent episodes are available strictly on CBS's All Access streaming service. Cost is $6/month with ads, $10/month ad-free. (NOTE: The second episode was made available immediately after episode 1 aired. Episodes 3-7 will be released weekly, there will be a break, and then the remaining episodes will again be released weekly early in 2018.)

Ars Technica has a review that mostly praised the new show. (There were at least two technical inaccuracies in the review concerning the first episode.)

For those who may not yet have seen it, I kindly ask folks who comment on this story to make liberal use of the <spoiler>don't show this unless they click here</spoiler> tags.

What did you think? Was it entertaining? Did it hold closely [enough] to existing Star Trek canon? Was any 'ideology' change you saw sufficiently warranted?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:47PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:47PM (#573296)

    The same people who mock religion always find all sorts of "hidden meaning" in their favorite Hollywood-produced commercial fiction.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Overrated=1, Touché=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:58PM (#573313)

    Multiple interpretations are what define a classic.

    One time, a pair of Jehovah's Witnesses stopped by, and were telling me how amazing the Bible is, how the stories are so good that they could be Hollywood movies.

    I said: "Yeah. The Jews are known for being able to spin a good fiction."

    There was a moment of understanding in their eyes.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:20PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:20PM (#573342) Journal

    The same people who mock religion always find all sorts of "hidden meaning" in their favorite Hollywood-produced commercial fiction.

    Thinking a human writer might be implying something with his words is a pretty reasonable hypothesis.

    Thinking some text on planet earth wasn't written by a human at all is a pretty mock-worthy hypothesis.

  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Tuesday September 26 2017, @07:07PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @07:07PM (#573398)

    There's "hidden meanings" in almost everything
    - those things the author intentionally hid as "Easter eggs" for the attentive reader
    - those things the author themselves didn't realize they were inserting (generally threads of their own assumptions and prejudices)
    - and those things the reader inserts into their own interpretation (as reading is inherently a collaborative act)

    Where mocking religion comes in is assuming that the work, and thus the hidden meanings, are the work of a divine being and thus reveal a higher truth. "Higher truths" in a fictional universe are fair game precisely because everyone recognizes that they are threads inserted by that universe's undisputed Creator(s). A lot of people take offense when you give the same treatment to holy texts.