Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-boldy-go? dept.

CBS premiered its new Star Trek series "Discovery" on Sunday. The first episode was made available on OTA (over-the-air) CBS stations — but it and all subsequent episodes are available strictly on CBS's All Access streaming service. Cost is $6/month with ads, $10/month ad-free. (NOTE: The second episode was made available immediately after episode 1 aired. Episodes 3-7 will be released weekly, there will be a break, and then the remaining episodes will again be released weekly early in 2018.)

Ars Technica has a review that mostly praised the new show. (There were at least two technical inaccuracies in the review concerning the first episode.)

For those who may not yet have seen it, I kindly ask folks who comment on this story to make liberal use of the <spoiler>don't show this unless they click here</spoiler> tags.

What did you think? Was it entertaining? Did it hold closely [enough] to existing Star Trek canon? Was any 'ideology' change you saw sufficiently warranted?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by tangomargarine on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:59PM (4 children)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:59PM (#573315)

    How did Kneelix end up in Star Fleet?

    Neelix was a special case, as they were stuck in the middle of nowhere and needed a guide. Also I don't think he was ever officially part of Starfleet, either. He was a cook, counselor, and ambassador of sorts.

    Tom Paris was given a field commission in that show, too, and it sounded pretty doubtful he would've been given that second chance normally, as he was a felon.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday September 27 2017, @03:57AM (3 children)

    by dry (223) on Wednesday September 27 2017, @03:57AM (#573656) Journal

    Do you really think that they'll have feudal things like felons? Even in the 21st (and at least a good chunk of the 20th) only 2 countries still have felons.

    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday September 27 2017, @02:20PM (2 children)

      by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday September 27 2017, @02:20PM (#573806)

      Even in the 21st (and at least a good chunk of the 20th) only 2 countries still have felons.

      What? I'm confused what you're talking about.

      fel·on1
      ˈfelən/Submit
      noun
      1.
      a person who has been convicted of a felony.

      fel·o·ny
      ˈfelənē/Submit
      noun
      a crime, typically one involving violence, regarded as more serious than a misdemeanor, and usually punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or by death.

      http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Punishment/Maximum-length-of-sentence [nationmaster.com]

      From that link it looks like only about a bazillion countries have prison sentences longer than a year for *some* crime.

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
      • (Score: 2) by dry on Saturday September 30 2017, @02:56AM (1 child)

        by dry (223) on Saturday September 30 2017, @02:56AM (#575170) Journal

        Sorry for not replying sooner.
        I'm thinking more of the legal definition, basically a class of people who have their rights permanently, or close enough, curtailed. Not its use in culture, which is mostly American culture where it is used.
        eg, being a felon in America means,

        The consequences felons face in most states include:[22]

                Disenfranchisement (expressly permitted by the Fourteenth Amendment, as noted by the Supreme Court)[23]
                Exclusion from obtaining certain licenses, such as a visa, or professional licenses required to legally operate (making some vocations off-limits to felons)
                Exclusion from purchase and possession of firearms, ammunition, and body armor
                Ineligibility to serve on a jury
                Ineligibility for government assistance or welfare, including being barred from federally funded housing
                Removal (deportation) (if not a citizen)

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony [wikipedia.org]

        In most of the free world, serving your sentence means that you are once again a regular citizen and most of those rights have to be removed by a Judge as part of sentencing rather then as a letter of attainment passed by the legislature. Here, restrictions on firearms, only happens if a Judge says, usually due to being stupid with a firearm. Put on a sex list, only if a Judge considers the crime deserving of it. Most of those others seem barbaric though deportation is pretty usual for non-citizens.

        • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday October 02 2017, @02:56PM

          by tangomargarine (667) on Monday October 02 2017, @02:56PM (#575914)

          Aha. Okay that makes more sense.

          --
          "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"