Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday September 26 2017, @05:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-boldy-go? dept.

CBS premiered its new Star Trek series "Discovery" on Sunday. The first episode was made available on OTA (over-the-air) CBS stations — but it and all subsequent episodes are available strictly on CBS's All Access streaming service. Cost is $6/month with ads, $10/month ad-free. (NOTE: The second episode was made available immediately after episode 1 aired. Episodes 3-7 will be released weekly, there will be a break, and then the remaining episodes will again be released weekly early in 2018.)

Ars Technica has a review that mostly praised the new show. (There were at least two technical inaccuracies in the review concerning the first episode.)

For those who may not yet have seen it, I kindly ask folks who comment on this story to make liberal use of the <spoiler>don't show this unless they click here</spoiler> tags.

What did you think? Was it entertaining? Did it hold closely [enough] to existing Star Trek canon? Was any 'ideology' change you saw sufficiently warranted?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by bradley13 on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:27PM (5 children)

    by bradley13 (3053) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @06:27PM (#573351) Homepage Journal

    "the ONLY white Klingon on screen is going to be the bad and evil Klingon while the hero of Star Trek is going to be a black woman, subtle ..."

    Second that. The Klingons are stand-ins for the deplorables, all nationalistic and shit. The Federations stands in for the SJW diversity wet-dream. Add in the "white male" vs. "black female" aspect. Add in the question as to whether or not "Michael" is transgender - that cannot be accidental. Yep, progressive politics all the way. I'll pass, I'm not even going to bother pirating it.

    I watched the first two episodes of The Orville. The humor starts off a bit corny, but seems to settle in (or maybe you get used to it). It's a hell of a lot truer to what I consider the Star Trek spirit.

    I wish I could get The Orville legitimately where I live, but I can't ("this content is not available in your location"). Idiots.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=3, Overrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday September 26 2017, @08:51PM (4 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday September 26 2017, @08:51PM (#573493) Journal

    The only people more whiny and victimized than SJWs are the people who use the term SJW.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @09:15PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @09:15PM (#573511)

      "Communist" is a much better term to use to describe such people.

      • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday September 27 2017, @12:05AM (1 child)

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Wednesday September 27 2017, @12:05AM (#573573) Journal

        "Communist" is a much better term to use to describe such people.

        Which ones?

        The ones that refuse to watch a sci-fi show because it might disagree with their politics?

        Or, the ones that don't actually exist in any meaningful sense?

        I guess it must be the second since communists also don't actually exist in any meaningful sense.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 27 2017, @02:28PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 27 2017, @02:28PM (#573811)
          I've heard the same said of Scotsmen.
    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @09:18PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26 2017, @09:18PM (#573513)

      Does that not include you?