Showtime, a premium cable, satellite, and streaming television service owned by CBS, included JavaScript on two of its domains that used users' web browsers to mine the cryptocurrency Monero:
The websites of US telly giant CBS's Showtime contained JavaScript that secretly commandeered viewers' web browsers over the weekend to mine cryptocurrency.
The flagship Showtime.com and its instant-access ShowtimeAnytime.com sibling silently pulled in code that caused browsers to blow spare processor time calculating new Monero coins – a privacy-focused alternative to the ever-popular Bitcoin. The hidden software typically consumed as much as 60 per cent of CPU capacity on computers visiting the sites.
The scripts were written by Code Hive, a legit outfit that provides JavaScript to website owners: webmasters add the code to their pages so that they can earn slivers of cash from each visitor as an alternative to serving adverts to generate revenue. Over time, money mined by the Code-Hive-hosted scripts adds up and is transferred from Coin Hive to the site's administrators. One Monero coin, 1 XMR, is worth about $92 right now.
However, it's extremely unlikely that a large corporation like CBS would smuggle such a piece of mining code onto its dot-coms – especially since it charges subscribers to watch the hit TV shows online – suggesting someone hacked the websites' source code to insert the mining JavaScript and make a quick buck.
The JavaScript, which appeared on the sites at the start of the weekend and vanished by Monday, sits between HTML comment tags that appear to be an insert from web analytics biz New Relic. Again, it is unlikely that an analytics company would deliberately stash coin-mining scripts onto its customers' pages, so the code must have come from another source – or was injected by miscreants who had compromised Showtime's systems.
Also at PCMag.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by takyon on Wednesday September 27 2017, @11:39PM (7 children)
Wouldn't it be more efficient and ethical to have users run the mining code themselves and donate the currency to a Soylent wallet?
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 4, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 27 2017, @11:43PM
SSShhh... that's the logical solution so of course that means it won't be considered at all what-so-ever.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 28 2017, @12:02AM (2 children)
Especially since JavaScript miners are, as I understand it, completely unable to access the GPU resources. Although, that isn't much help as even GPU mining isn't really effective without a super powerful card, because of all the ASIC and FPGA miners out there.
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday September 28 2017, @12:07AM
IIRC, the code I've seen used funky WebGL shaders I didn't grok to mine BTC through the GPU.
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday September 28 2017, @12:12AM
Also, whether or not GPU mining is competitive depends on whether or not the coin using a given algorithm is valuable enough to warrant the production of special-purpose hardware. Some coins have no ASICs yet. Note that CBS/hackers-of-CBS used Monero, not Bitcoin (I don't know if there are ASICS targeting Monero yet, but I doubt it based on their choice).
(Score: 3, Informative) by edIII on Thursday September 28 2017, @01:44AM (2 children)
Well.... perhaps, but that doesn't let me be a lazy bastard and just expect you to make it happen :)
Now that I think about it, with as many devices that I have that could also operate a modern web browser, it might not be a bad idea to look into getting the JS code myself and hosting a server.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Thursday September 28 2017, @02:45PM (1 child)
Honestly, I'm not going to go out of my way to set up any mining software, make a transfer, blah blah blah. I just have too many things going on to add yet another thing to figure out, especially one I'm not that interested in (I've never participated in the crypto-currency scene).
However, I very much like the idea you mentioned though, of just letting Soylent figure it out and handle the mining. I don't see any ethical issues at all provided it is an "opt-in" system. Running it in secret would be problematic because some people may need to save money on electricity, but to say to users "hey, you can help Soylent out by letting us run some mining software in the background while you're logged in, will you let us do it?" is 100% pure and ethical. It would also let people who can't or don't by subscriptions help out and if that makes them warm fuzzies, it's 110% ethical.
(Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Thursday September 28 2017, @02:47PM
Change "_makes_ them warm fuzzies" to "_gives_ them warm fuzzies".
I've even had coffee already dang it.