Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday September 28 2017, @02:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-have-trust-issues dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

More than a week after it said most people would be eligible to enroll in a free year of its TrustedID identity theft monitoring service, big three consumer credit bureau Equifax has begun sending out email notifications to people who were able to take the company up on its offer. But in yet another security stumble, the company appears to be training recipients to fall for phishing scams.

Some people who signed up for the service after Equifax announced Sept. 7 that it had lost control over Social Security numbers, dates of birth and other sensitive data on 143 million Americans are still waiting for the promised notice from Equifax. But as I recently noted on Twitter, other folks have received emails from Equifax over the past few days, and the messages do not exactly come across as having emanated from a company that cares much about trying to regain the public's trust.

[...] the email purports to have been sent from trustedid.com, a domain that Equifax has owned for almost four years. However, Equifax apparently decided it was time for a new — and perhaps snazzier — name: trustedidpremier.com.

The [above-pictured] message says it was sent from one domain, and then asks the recipient to respond by clicking on a link to a completely different (but confusingly similar) domain.

My guess is the reason Equifax registered trustedidpremier.com was to help people concerned about the breach to see whether they were one of the 143 million people affected (for more on how that worked out for them, see Equifax Breach Response Turns Dumpster Fire). I'd further surmise that Equifax was expecting (and received) so much interest in the service as a result of the breach that all the traffic from the wannabe customers might swamp the trustedid.com site and ruin things for the people who were already signed up for the service before Equifax announced the breach on Sept. 7.

The problem with this dual-domain approach is that the domain trustedidpremier.com is only a few weeks old, so it had very little time to establish itself as a legitimate domain. As a result, in the first few hours after Equifax disclosed the breach the domain was actually flagged as a phishing site by multiple browsers because it was brand new and looked about as professionally designed as a phishing site.

What's more, there is nothing tying the domain registration records for trustedidpremier.com to Equifax: The domain is registered to a WHOIS privacy service, which masks information about who really owns the domain (again, not exactly something you might expect from an identity monitoring site). Anyone looking for assurances that the site perhaps was hosted on Internet address space controlled by and assigned to Equifax would also be disappointed: The site is hosted at Amazon.

While there's nothing wrong with that exactly, one might reasonably ask: Why didn't Equifax just send the email from Equifax.com and host the ID theft monitoring service there as well? Wouldn't that have considerably lessened any suspicion that this missive might be a phishing attempt?

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Thursday September 28 2017, @04:19PM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Thursday September 28 2017, @04:19PM (#574405) Homepage
    If you have to tell someone that you're trustworthy, then you aren't.

    (substitute "a lady", or "powerful" for alternative equivalents, or combine both to get a Thatcher quote)

    As for adding "premier", that's the word that bean-counter-driven multinational breweries add to pissy lagers to inform you that they've reduced costs in beer production, and are now charging you as much as they can for the privilege. (Of course, their overall costs may have gone up, as the marketting budget probably got a boost from having a new label to saturation advertise, and a I'm sure a C-level suit will be giving himself a nice hefty pat on the wallet for this great innovation.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 28 2017, @06:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 28 2017, @06:23PM (#574469)

    Yes, trustedid.com sounds sleazy. Given how many monitors contain blatant lies in the EDID, you'd have to be pretty naive to trust it, and anyone setting up a website to convince you to trust EDID is probably trying to blind you with blurry LCD interpolation.