Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday September 29 2017, @11:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the nothing-up-my-sleeve...-oh,-wait. dept.

Google and Levi's have designed a "smart jacket" with a touch-sensitive cuff that can control a smartphone:

More than a year after it was announced and two years after we first saw a demonstration of touch-sensitive fabric, the Levi's jacket with a smart sleeve is finally going on sale. I've been wearing this Levi's Commuter Trucker jacket for a few days now and it's very nice. It fits well and looks great. And by swiping or tapping the fabric on the left cuff, I have been able to control my smartphone.

Whether those things add up to a $350 value — the price of this jacket — is entirely a different question. It's targeted at people who commute by bike, and I think the only people beyond that target market are going to be a few techies and people who just really like jean jackets. It works with both Android and iPhone, by the way. A standard Levi's trucker jacket costs $148, though Levi's has been quick to point out that designer denim jackets can run well over $400. I'm no fashion critic, but I can tell you I'm impressed with the fit and look of this one.

When you talk to both Levi's and Google, they're very eager to tell a design story about this jacket, not just a technology story. It comes out of a partnership between the clothing company and a small division of Google dedicated to experimentation. We've seen lots of weird projects inside Google's ATAP, but most of them (like the ill-fated Project Ara) have ended up getting scuttled.

According to Google, the jacket can only be washed "up to" ten times:

This might be more of an interesting notion to think about if you watch the promotional video for the new piece of smart clothing as it's referenced as being washable as long as you remove the smart tag which connects to the fibers and to your phone through Bluetooth. This is also mentioned in the official blog post about the jacket when it was announced as being available this week, so you might think that removing the tag would be all that's needed, but if the wash limit is correct than[sic] any customers who pick this up might have to be a little more careful with what they spill on the jacket to ensure it stays as clean as possible.

It's also noted that the wash limit is merely "up to" ten times, with it being stated that the experience could vary from user to user, with various factors like wash cycle and usage playing a part in how many times the jacket can be washed.

Also at Google's Blog, SFist, and 9to5google.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by anubi on Saturday September 30 2017, @06:26AM (2 children)

    by anubi (2828) on Saturday September 30 2017, @06:26AM (#575214) Journal

    So right...

    it's a good way of showing people that you are prepared to just part with your money whenever some megabrand says you should do...

    I was discussing high-end branding with a friend and noted that these brands weren't in business to sell a product. Selling products is Wal-Mart's business.

    What these brands are selling is the opportunity to signal to your peer group that you have disposable income. Its a way to publicly display you have money to burn.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday September 30 2017, @08:08AM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Saturday September 30 2017, @08:08AM (#575225) Homepage
    I will confess that I did feel a small pang of hypocricy as I was writing my prior post, as just the prior day I had purchased something which was more expensive than this jacket, and had absolutely no use at all apart from being pretty for me to look at at home. At least it will theoretically last for ever (as measured on human timecales).

    But outwardly signalling, not guilty - I look like a peasant who doesn't have two groats to rub together.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 1) by anubi on Saturday September 30 2017, @09:20AM

      by anubi (2828) on Saturday September 30 2017, @09:20AM (#575237) Journal

      I look like a peasant who doesn't have two groats to rub together.

      Smart man... that way you do not attract trouble.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]