Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday September 29 2017, @06:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-don't-say dept.

Submitted via IRC for guy_

Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies have been given an ultimatum by the European Union: rid your platforms of hate speech or face legal consequences.

European regulators have been pushing social media firms to remove racist and violent posts from their platforms in a timely manner for years. Their patience is running out.

Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and Google have all pledged to do more. In May 2016, they promised to review a majority of hate speech flagged by users within 24 hours and to remove any illegal content.

But the European Commission, EU's top regulator, said Thursday they are still failing to act fast enough. It said it would pass laws allowing the EU to impose punishments on companies that fail to act.

"The situation is not sustainable: in more than 28% of cases, it takes more than one week for online platforms to take down illegal content," said Mariya Gabriel, the EU's top official in charge of the digital economy and society.

The Commission said it will consider implementing new laws to tackle the problem if the online platforms fail to "take swift action over the coming months."

Source: http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/28/technology/hate-speech-facebook-twitter-europe/index.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 29 2017, @07:40PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 29 2017, @07:40PM (#575013)

    decentralization

    The technical solution to all of this monkey business is not terribly difficult. The only reason I don't want to work on it is because, paradoxically, nobody desirable* will want to use it until its too late. People, somehow, do not seem well adapted to extrapolating the future from the present. 'Well, I can still use things just fine. Well more or less, so why would I ever change?'

    * - the corollary of that is that you'll have no shortage of pedos, criminals, and other lovely individuals signing up on day 1 which will ensure further deterrence of the masses

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 29 2017, @07:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 29 2017, @07:45PM (#575017)

    You're dead right. In fact, we need more than pure decentralisation. We need topology independence, and native encryption, encapsulation and forwarding capabilities.

    A good first approach may be a sort of automated store-and-forward, a la UUCP.

  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by Runaway1956 on Saturday September 30 2017, @02:49AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday September 30 2017, @02:49AM (#575169) Journal

    That is rather insightful. The various "underground" networks, such as I2P, are currently infested with child porn people. More "desirable" people are in short supply, and when they show up, they quickly leave because of the child porn. It takes a special kind of person to ignore and/or fight the CP, while working on the infrastructure.