Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday September 29 2017, @06:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-don't-say dept.

Submitted via IRC for guy_

Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies have been given an ultimatum by the European Union: rid your platforms of hate speech or face legal consequences.

European regulators have been pushing social media firms to remove racist and violent posts from their platforms in a timely manner for years. Their patience is running out.

Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and Google have all pledged to do more. In May 2016, they promised to review a majority of hate speech flagged by users within 24 hours and to remove any illegal content.

But the European Commission, EU's top regulator, said Thursday they are still failing to act fast enough. It said it would pass laws allowing the EU to impose punishments on companies that fail to act.

"The situation is not sustainable: in more than 28% of cases, it takes more than one week for online platforms to take down illegal content," said Mariya Gabriel, the EU's top official in charge of the digital economy and society.

The Commission said it will consider implementing new laws to tackle the problem if the online platforms fail to "take swift action over the coming months."

Source: http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/28/technology/hate-speech-facebook-twitter-europe/index.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @12:30AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @12:30AM (#575141)

    I myself am no fan of the "blood and soil" crowd but . . .

    You could have made things simpler for everyone if you had just written, "I am not a racist, but . . ."

    you appear to be bias and bigoted

    Grammar note: persons cannot be "bias". Perhaps you meant "biased"? Again, we cannot have white supremacy because white folks are just such uneducated manglers of the languages. Perhaps we should put them all out of their misery? Or perhaps move them all to Missouri, where they would not have to read or right.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Touché=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @12:40AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @12:40AM (#575143)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @09:11AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @09:11AM (#575232)

    You could have made things simpler for everyone if you had just written, "I am not a racist, but . . ."

    "... those using racial identity politics as the key component of their divide and conquer strategy are".

    Grammar note: persons cannot be "bias". Perhaps you meant "biased"?

    Perhaps I edited what I wrote and overlooked a word that scans near identically either way?

    where they would not have to read or right.

    Cute mod needed.