Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday September 30 2017, @10:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the trying-to-be-the-DMV dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow5743

Websites that publish mug shots and charge for their removal have defeated one lawsuit after the other, claiming First Amendment protection. But that defense to this shady industry may be about to burst. That's because a federal judge, ruling on a lawsuit by several arrestees suing Mughshots.com, just approved a novel class-action. It's one that takes legal advantage of the site's practice of displaying advertising links to paid removal services that the lawsuit claims are owned by Mugshots.com.

US District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman of Chicago didn't go so far as to say this vile practice amounted to extortion, as alleged. Instead, she ruled (PDF) that this likely amounted to a violation of the arrestees' right of publicity because the site was using the mug shots as actual advertisements for the paid removal service.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/09/mugshot-website-must-face-class-action-for-charging-to-remove-photos/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday September 30 2017, @10:07PM (3 children)

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday September 30 2017, @10:07PM (#575390) Journal

    Are these mugshots of convicts or merely arrested people?
    These days you can get arrested simply because the cop doesn't like your choice of shoes.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday September 30 2017, @10:35PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday September 30 2017, @10:35PM (#575396) Journal

    I would assume it is everyone, not just convicts, but it could depend on the state.

    Florida in particular [wired.com] has a series of Sunshine public records laws that require many forms of public records to be available by request, but PDs seem to just put the mugshots online due to their own policy. (Florida's public records laws may change because the people in charge are getting pissed off at Jeff Gray/HonorYourOath, Joel Chandler, and others.)

    People who have been arrested but not convicted or charged could be the most likely to fall for the scam. If you are convicted, you are going to have employment issues no matter what, and are likely to be much poorer when you get out of prison. The straight edge arrestees that are let off the hook are going to be more intimidated by what they find on Google.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by Osamabobama on Sunday October 01 2017, @05:02AM

    by Osamabobama (5842) on Sunday October 01 2017, @05:02AM (#575480)

    These days you can get arrested simply because the cop doesn't like your choice of shoes.

    In case that bit sounded like hyperbole, here's the actual reaction by the MS-13 gang leaders:
    Top MS-14 Leader Warns Gang not to Wear Nike Cortez Shoes as Feds Arrest 3,800 Members [newsweek.com].

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @09:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @09:25AM (#575507)

    Yep, and if you get arrested again, the judge will look at that prior arrest, regardless of whether or not any conviction resulted, and take it as proof as guilt.