Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday October 01 2017, @02:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the we'll-see-what-you-did-there dept.

Amazon is dramatically ramping up its production for next year, moving forward with three new high-concept series, Variety has learned. These new efforts represent a significant production investment from the studio, which is currently in preproduction, production or post on 67 TV series and 20 movies around the world.

The streaming service is developing the following:

• “Lazarus,” based on a comic book by Greg Rucka (“Marvel’s Jessica Jones”), is set in an alternative near future, where the world has been divided among 16 rival families, who run their territories in a feudal system. Each family has allies and enemies among the other families. To crush uprisings and fight wars, most families have a Lazarus: a one-person kill squad.

Rucka serves as writer and executive producer on “Lazarus,” along with Michael Lark (“Captain America: The Winter Soldier”) and Angela Cheng Caplan.

• “Snow Crash,” which is based on Neal Stephenson’s cult novel, is a one-hour science fiction drama set in futuristic America. In reality, Hiro Protagonist delivers pizza for Uncle Enzo’s CosoNostra Pizza Inc., but in the Metaverse he’s a warrior prince. Plunging headlong into the enigma of a new computer virus that’s striking down hackers everywhere, he races along the neon-lit streets on a search-and-destroy mission for the shadowy virtual villain.

A co-production with Paramount Television, “Snow Crash” is executive produced by Joe Cornish (“Ant-Man”) and Frank Marshall (“Back to the Future”).

• “Ringworld,” a co-production with MGM, is based on Larry Niven’s sci-fi book series from the 70’s. It tells the story of Louis Gridley Wu, a bored man celebrating his 200th birthday in a technologically-advanced, future Earth. Upon being offered one of the open positions on a voyage, Louis joins a young woman and two aliens to explore Ringworld, the remote artificial ring beyond “Known Space.”

Not bad, but maybe we're all better off going outside to play.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @05:03PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @05:03PM (#575610)

    Congratulations for being able to repeat what the OP was saying.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:07PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:07PM (#575626)

    There's a few people that take AC postings and repost under their own id. That way they get upmods from people that only read at +1 and never saw the original post.

    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Monday October 02 2017, @12:44AM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Monday October 02 2017, @12:44AM (#575720) Journal

      Really? Why would they bother? Karma in this community doesn't give you much. Or is this happening because Slashdot is still having troubles and its trolls are foraging further afield?

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
  • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:11PM

    by acid andy (1683) on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:11PM (#575627) Homepage Journal

    Ohhh I get it now, you're a bot! How do you do?

    --
    If a cat has kittens, does a rat have rittens, a bat bittens and a mat mittens?
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:23PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:23PM (#575635)

    No, dumbass.

    OP said the "good old days" were better because participation entertainment is better than spectator entertainment, and in the old days there was less spectator entertainment available, and thus people were forced to engage in participation entertainment. (Or walk the path of the bookworm, but whatever...)

    GP pointed out you don't need all the downsides of the "good old days" because you can choose participation entertainment today -- just because there's a shitton of TV doesn't mean you have to sit on the couch and watch it.

    Rebutting part of a post (good old days = better) while agreeing with another part (participation vs. spectator) is not the same as repeating it.

    • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:40PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:40PM (#575643)

      The OP never said anything about being forced to do anything.

      Invalid form key: r4t7lOEMSu

      Suck a cock, SoylentNews, you programmers' garbage.