Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday October 06 2017, @02:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the nation-state-is-over dept.

Some of the great moments of history sneak up on businesspeople. Two years ago, Britain looked to be Europe's most economically rational country; now its companies seem to be rolling from one economic earthquake to another, with Brexit looking increasingly likely to be followed by the election of a near-Marxist prime minister, Jeremy Corbyn.

Looking back, two things stand out. First, there were some deep underlying "irrational" causes that business ignored, such as the pent-up anger against immigration and globalization. Second, there was a string of short-term political decisions that proved to be miscalculations. For decades, for example, attacking the European Union was a "free hit" for British politicians. If David Cameron had it to do over again, would he really have made the referendum on whether to stay in it a simple majority vote (or indeed called a vote at all)? Does Angela Merkel now regret giving Cameron so few concessions before the Brexit vote? Would the moderate Labour members of Parliament who helped Corbyn get on their party's leadership ballot in the name of political diversity really do that again?

Now, another rupture may be sneaking up on Europe, driven by a similar mixture of pent-up anger and short-term political maneuvering. This one is between the old West European democratic core of the EU, led by Merkel and increasingly by Emmanuel Macron, who are keen to integrate the euro zone, and the populist authoritarians of Eastern Europe, who dislike Brussels. This time the arguments are ones about political freedom and national sovereignty.

Eastern Europe's gripes are nothing a little anschluss couldn't cure.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Friday October 06 2017, @02:59PM

    by fritsd (4586) on Friday October 06 2017, @02:59PM (#578040) Journal

    Most of those people, if they despised western civilization, they would have just stayed at home. It would have been much easier.

    If you'd rather risk your and your family's life than stay in an islamo-fascist warzone, then there are (in general) reasons for that; i.e. maybe the risks for your family are a bit larger than your neighbours, because you're educated, or of the wrong tribe, or don't like your daughters wearing a tent outdoors, etc.

    If you'd rather live in central Sweden with its 6 months winter, where in the midwinter it is night at 15:00 and -20°C, than in sunny Eritrea or Herat or Homs, then it is probably not because you despise western civilization so much (unless, of course, you're some kind of masochist).

    You can't stop people at a border, if they'd rather DIE than stay on their side. Cf. die Mauer.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2