Silicon Valley celebrates artificial intelligence and robotics as fields that have the power to improve people's lives, through inventions like driverless cars and robot carers for the elderly.
That message isn't getting through to the rest of the country, where more than 70% of Americans express wariness or concern about a world where machines perform many of the tasks done by humans, according to Pew Research.
The findings have wide-reaching implications for technology companies working in these fields and indicates the need for greater public hand-holding.
"Ordinary Americans are very wary and concerned about the growing trend in automation and place a lot of value in human decision-making," said Aaron Smith, the author of the research, which surveyed more than 4,000 US adults. "They are not incredibly excited about machines taking over those responsibilities."
Once robots are perfected the 99% can be eliminated so they stop bumming the 1% out.
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Saturday October 07 2017, @01:48PM (1 child)
I don't believe that was the origin of the story, as the version I encountered was slightly different, and I believe I encountered it earlier (though I'm not sure of that).
And you can take it as denigrating ambition, or as recommending the careful and wise use of resources. I took it the second way.
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Sunday October 08 2017, @12:00AM
What careful use of resources? The village idiot carefully and wisely saved his resources for years... then bought a cannon. There are several aspects that make this story highly condescending. First, as I noted earlier, cannon polishing is a pretty useless activity. It's insulting to compare a normal person's ambition whether as business owner or bureaucrat to that. Second, the village idiot foolishly rejects a boon of the state for his own ambitious folly. That's a very patronizing view of anyone who doesn't accept government largess (or some similar authority figure, like an existing business). Third, the moral as applied by either your initial post or by the congresscritter I linked to, is that it is better to not "polish the cannon". There is no sense in which your posts can be said to encourage "careful and wise use" of resources except not to do it in the first place. Bear in mind that you wrote afterward:
Why assume that mhajicek had never thought about the consequences of starting his own business? What's "careful and wise" about this advice?