SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Editor's summary: BuzzFeed, a media outlet and Pulitzer Prize finalist, obtained leaked emails from Breitbart News, some of which were published in Buzzfeed's roughly 9,000-word exposé of the site's inner workings. The article chronicles the rise of Milo Yiannopoulos, Breitbart's tech editor, and his relationship with Steve Bannon, the recent White House Chief Strategist who left the Trump administration and resumed his position as executive chairman of Breitbart News in August. It also details exchanges between Yiannopoulos and people such as Peter Thiel, Devin Saucier, and Curtis Yarvin, among others. The article shows how Breitbart "smuggled white nationalist ideas into the mainstream" by using Yiannopoulos as a go-between for white nationalists and others in his following, who provided him with story tips and constructive (?) criticism.
Vice Media has fired Mitchell Sunderland, an editor and writer for Broadly, Vice's women-focused site. Sunderland emailed Yiannopoulos and encouraged him to mock the feminist writer Lindy West. He also sent a Broadly video about the Satanic Temple and abortion rights to Tim Gionet, Yiannopoulos's tour manager, resulting in this story. Dan Lyons, a writer for the TV series Silicon Valley and author of Disrupted: My Misadventure in the Start-Up Bubble, and David Auerbach, a former technology writer for Slate, also passed along news tips to Breitbart. Auerbach has vociferously denied writing the emails.
Milo Yiannopoulos responded on Thursday, mainly taking issue with a video of him singing karaoke while Richard Spencer and others raised Nazi salutes. Yiannopoulos wrote, "I have said in the past that I find humor in breaking taboos and laughing at things that people tell me are forbidden to joke about. Everyone who knows me has seen me make jokes about some awful things. But everyone who knows me also knows I'm not a racist. As someone of Jewish ancestry, I of course condemn racism in the strongest possible terms. I have stopped making jokes on these matters because I do not want any confusion on this subject. I disavow Richard Spencer and his entire sorry band of idiots. I have been and am a steadfast supporter of Jews and Israel. I disavow white nationalism and I disavow racism and I always have. I have severe myopia, due to a congenital eye defect, as has been widely reported and as many people know or have seen from my squinting during public speeches. In a dark bar, I did not see these hand gestures. If I'd have realized white nationalist losers were hailing me as their leader, I'd have immediately walked off stage. I stand for, as always, race-blind nationalism. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm enjoying my honeymoon with my black husband."
Broadening Brush: Alt-White, Buzzfeed Exposé!
BuzzFeed has published documentation of the direct connection of Breitbart News, the alt-right movement, and Milo Yiannopoulos to white supremacists and neo-Nazi groups:
In August, after a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville ended in murder, Steve Bannon insisted that "there's no room in American society" for neo-Nazis, neo-Confederates, and the KKK.
But an explosive cache of documents obtained by BuzzFeed News proves that there was plenty of room for those voices on his website.
During the 2016 presidential campaign, under Bannon's leadership, Breitbart courted the alt-right — the insurgent, racist right-wing movement that helped sweep Donald Trump to power. The former White House chief strategist famously remarked that he wanted Breitbart to be "the platform for the alt-right."
The article is extensive, quoting from emails from the Breitbart organization itself.
In March, Breitbart editor Alex Marlow insisted "we're not a hate site." Breitbart's media relations staff repeatedly threatened to sue outlets that described Yiannopoulos as racist. And after the violent white supremacist protest in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August, Breitbart published an article explaining that when Bannon said the site welcomed the alt-right, he was merely referring to "computer gamers and blue-collar voters who hated the GOP brand."
These new emails and documents, however, clearly show that Breitbart does more than tolerate the most hate-filled, racist voices of the alt-right. It thrives on them, fueling and being fueled by some of the most toxic beliefs on the political spectrum — and clearing the way for them to enter the American mainstream.
Sometimes, it is good to know who you are lying down with, so you will know why you have fleas. And sometimes, journalists ought to "follow the money." I highly recommend reading the article, "Here's How Breitbart And Milo Smuggled Nazi and White Nationalist Ideas Into The Mainstream".
Liberal collusion with Alt-right! Shocking!
Now the Salon is getting into the fray, reporting on BuzzFeed's dump of Breitbart emails and pointing out that many liberal journalists are implicated.
A recently released cache of email correspondence revealed direct collaboration between popular alt-right website Breitbart and purported white nationalists and neo-Nazis. While the revelations are damning, they are not entirely surprising to those who follow Breitbart's editorial strategies. More shocking, perhaps, is that a number of purportedly liberal journalists have also secretly colluded with Breitbart over the years.
Again, this is a lengthy article, well worth the read, that goes into detail on the relations of Breitbart News to other journalistic entities, and political extremists. One example:
The surprising journalistic connections to Yiannopoulos include David Auerbach, a tech critic who has contributed extensively to Slate and has been published in intellectual left magazines like n+1, Triple Canopy, and even the Nation, one of the most esteemed voices of the American left. Auerbach once wrote a longform piece of cultural criticism for Triple Canopy exploring how the politics of anonymous online forum culture (A-Culture, in his parlance) eventually evolved into the fusion of libertarianism and racist nationalism that we now associate with sites like 4chan, 8chan and Reddit in its prelapsarian days.
Though anonymity does not play directly into the majority of the discussions on forums associated with A-culture, it is responsible—along with the written nature of the discourse—for the characteristics that have emerged from those sites. . . . Anyone entering into an A-culture forum is likely to witness a nonstop barrage of obscenity, abuse, hostility, and epithets related to race, gender, and sexuality. Anyone objecting to this barrage will immediately attract a torrent of even greater abuse. These forums maintain an equilibrium of offense designed to drive away anyone who is not sympathetic to the general libertarian mindset.
But it does seem that Buzzfeed has stirred up a hornet's nest of buzzing, the type of thing that may even attract buzzards.
Shortly thereafter, Auerbach tweeted that he had "told [Buzzfeed editor Ariel Kaminer] that this stuff was untrue. He's currently trying to put words in my mouth." Auerbach went on to speculate that "Buzzfeed might have it in for me because I criticized Buzzfeed chair Keith Lerer for hiring 4chan's founder." "I also criticized Buzzfeed's business model in NYMag," he added. "So yeah, they're probably pissed at me."
More about sexism and male privilege than racism. Or more of a cat-fight among journalists and whatever those who work for Breitbart are. As Alice said, "Curiouser and curiouser."
(Score: 2, Troll) by jmorris on Monday October 09 2017, @03:01AM (3 children)
They can claim anything, but anyone who doesn't laugh is dumb. The Alt-Right preexisted the first BB article. All they did was some actual journalism. They heard of a new political movement, went out and researched, contacted what looked like central figures in the factions they discovered to exist and interviewed them. They then wrote up an article, sent it back out to their interview subjects for comments and corrections and then reported to their readers. The article was well received, re-reported in most of the mainstream media, etc. None of that implies in the slightest any sort of definition or creation of the Alt-Right. Vox Day's sixteen point checklist is considered one of the most reliable definitions since it encompasses all of the significant factions instead of only some of them.
I do wish the rules would settle out at some point. I remember CNN almost going into autistic screeching about the DNC Leaks, shouting how it was ILLEGAL and even talking about it was probably criminal. Now we have the internal emails of a journalistic operation hacked, and everyone admits Milo's account was hacked so shut up, and suddenly it seems ok. So lets be clear, everyone is perfectly fine with targeting and hacking journalists now. Just asking, because if New York Times leaks shows up it doesn't look like anyone gets to say a goddamned word now. And we are all ok with that? Hack the planet, publish all the secrets, all that old 90's hacker stuff for real now?
Buckle up, the ride is about to get bumpy.
Yea, that was choice stuff. Expected though, everyone can see this train wreck coming. Even, probably especially, the left activists. But they are caught in a holiness spiral and there is no figure with enough authority on the Left to break them out of it before it spins up to a full singularity and eats the whole Left. At least some are willing to try, almost kinda hopeful actually. They were quietly acting over a year before it broke out into full retard "Free Speech is White Privilege" insanity. If I weren't a hardened bastard who knows what vile people they are I'd feel pity for what is going to happen to them. But I don't. I'll make popcorn when it goes full cannibalism and won't make the mistake of allowing the survivors into the Right camp.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Monday October 09 2017, @03:08AM (1 child)
I don't really care what CNN has to say about leaking. Most of the people you see on there are paid to read, talk, and look good on camera.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 09 2017, @09:01AM
You're not their target audience.
The Russians did their propaganda stuff and tried to influence the voters (not the same as hacking the election). And CNN etc did their propaganda stuff and tried to influence the voters.
CNN etc are now trying to spread the idea that the election results are invalid just because allegedly the Russians did a better job influencing the voters.
But the hard truth is the Democrats lost the election by fielding a weaker candidate. They use lame excuses like racism and the electoral college but the fact is a black guy won twice! The Democrats wanted Trump as their opponent, they "elevated" him.
That the DNC still try to blame everyone else for their failures is not a good sign.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 10 2017, @04:47AM
>> Leaked documents/emails are news.
> I do wish the rules would settle out at some point. I remember CNN almost going into autistic screeching about the DNC Leaks, shouting how it was ILLEGAL
CNN saying it doesn't make it true. Do you really think that any soylents thought the DNC leaks weren't news?
"You didn't like it before, you can't have it now" doesn't apply to truth values of statements, nor to newsworthiness.