Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday October 10 2017, @11:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the me-me-me-me-me-me-me-me-me-me dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

In an age of political animus, increasing hostility toward "others," and 24/7 media coverage that seems to focus on the negative, a recent article in Frontiers in Psychology provides a glimmer of hope, particularly for those who live in the United States.

Written by Yale University academic Gabriel Grant, "Exploring the Possibility of Peak Individualism, Humanity's Existential Crisis, and an Emerging Age of Purpose" aims to clear up two competing views of today's cultural narrative in the United States. First is the traditional view of the next generation—millennials—whom many view as individualistic, materialistic, and narcissistic. Some even refer to millennials as "Gen Me" in response to those who develop their "personal brand" with selfies and social media posts.

In stark contrast there is a view of millennials as rejecting selfish values and leading America into a "great age of purpose." Unlike previous generations, simply earning money is not enough for them—significant data shows that younger people are searching for purpose in their lives and their work. Consider the fact that the non-profit group 80,000 Hours (whose name represents the amount of time spent at work in the average lifespan) even exists. 80,000 Hours provides career advice to help young people build careers with social impact. Universities and businesses are increasingly following this path to help millennial workers achieve their goal of finding purpose in their lives.

Both sides can provide reams of anecdotal evidence that supports their view of millennials, and until recently, there have been few studies on the issue. In his article, however, Grant theorized that Google's digitization of millions of books and the Ngram Viewer, a tool that shows how phrases have appeared in books, could allow a quantified analysis of culture over the past two centuries, and he used this approach to quantitatively test the popular notion that a drive for purpose is increasing. What he found is encouraging.

Yeah, because people with a healthy ego would never possibly do volunteer work...

Source: https://opensource.com/article/17/10/rise-open-source


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Wednesday October 11 2017, @03:59PM

    by TheRaven (270) on Wednesday October 11 2017, @03:59PM (#580528) Journal
    Juniper picked option 1 for a long time. The problem is that it only works if no one else is working upstream. Otherwise, upstream eventually gets a feature like your super-magic competitive advantage feature, but implemented in a totally different way. For everyone else, it's easy to move from the old version to the version that has this feature, but for you it's now much more expensive to merge from upstream, because interfaces may have changed to support the new feature, the performance characteristics of the new feature will have changed (which may confuse or upset your customers) and so on. Unless your feature is entirely modular (e.g. a filesystem that doesn't require any changes to the VFS layer), the cost of option 1 is likely to increase over time. Juniper learned this lesson and went through a big process of first consolidating all of their internal forks of JunOS and then upstreaming as much as possible. They aren't upstreaming because they want to make the world a better place, they're upstreaming because long experience has taught them that it's cheaper.
    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2