Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday October 11 2017, @05:45AM   Printer-friendly

As a warming world moves from fossil fuels toward renewable solar and wind energy, industrial forecasts predict an insatiable need for battery farms to store power and provide electricity when the sky is dark and the air is still. Against that backdrop, Stanford researchers have developed a sodium-based battery that can store the same amount of energy as a state-of-the-art lithium ion, at substantially lower cost.

Chemical engineer Zhenan Bao and her faculty collaborators, materials scientists Yi Cui and William Chueh, aren't the first researchers to design a sodium ion battery. But they believe the approach they describe in an Oct. 9 Nature Energy paper has the price and performance characteristics to create a sodium ion battery costing less than 80 percent of a lithium ion battery with the same storage capacity.

"Nothing may ever surpass lithium in performance," Bao said. "But lithium is so rare and costly that we need to develop high-performance but low-cost batteries based on abundant elements like sodium."

With materials constituting about one-quarter of a battery's price, the cost of lithium – about $15,000 a ton to mine and refine – looms large. That's why the Stanford team is basing its battery on widely available sodium-based electrode material that costs just $150 a ton.

Sodium batteries taste better, too.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 11 2017, @06:04PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 11 2017, @06:04PM (#580641)

    If Trump plays his cards wrong, we can skip sodium and go straight to plutonium as a power source in every home.

  • (Score: 2) by Osamabobama on Wednesday October 11 2017, @07:25PM

    by Osamabobama (5842) on Wednesday October 11 2017, @07:25PM (#580726)

    Unless you are on the west coast, you may have to settle for strontium and its neighbors that are carried over on the wind, with power delivered via beta decay. But maybe I'm underestimating Trump's cards...

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday October 11 2017, @09:44PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday October 11 2017, @09:44PM (#580808)

    My house will be powered by small hydro and dynamos, mounted on the outside of Trump's wall to collect energy from the people being thrown off the top, and their dripping blood, sweat and tears. That's the kind of renewables his people will get behind!