Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday October 12 2017, @07:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the oink-I-say dept.

Newsweek has this article on America's skewed definition of terrorism:

What is terrorism? According to the FBI, animal activists who stole two piglets from a farm were terrorists. As of now, Stephen Paddock, who killed 58 people at a country music concert in Las Vegas two weeks ago, has not been labeled a terrorist by the federal security organization.

In a viral story posted on The Intercept, journalist Glenn Greenwald details an account of federal agents investigating animal activists and scouring farm-animal sanctuaries to find two missing piglets that allegedly had been stolen from a farm. The FBI devoted such resources to finding these two piglets because their alleged theft and the capturing of undercover videos of the farm's conditions count as terrorism.

Why is the piglet theft classified as terrorism, but not the Las Vegas shooting? The distinction is rooted in the definition of the term. In spite of the emotions the word "terrorist" might elicit, the definition is not "mass killer" or "Muslim extremist" or "very bad person." The legal definition of terrorism is "the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property in order to coerce or intimidate a government or the civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Thursday October 12 2017, @08:03PM (1 child)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Thursday October 12 2017, @08:03PM (#581318) Journal

    No there isn't. There is a lot of evidence that people who are unfamiliar with objects flying faster than sound, produce a noise all of their own along their entire flight path. In the context of a bullet, this known as sonic crack (or supersonic crack) and is a noise totally separate from the bang from the rifle (or the echoes of either). In every video I've seen, I hear a sonic crack near the person recording (which means the bullet was near enough for them to hear the sonic crack for that portion of its flight) followed by the rifle's report -- as would be expected because the bullet is flying faster than sound - you'll hear the sonic boom first and then the sound of the bang because sound lags behind the bullet. While this sounds like two different things from different directions, it is all related to a single event - the distance bang and the nearby sonic crack are one event stretched out in time.

    This video demonstrates the effect rather well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-Fu_4iDOLQ [youtube.com]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Entropy on Thursday October 12 2017, @10:47PM

    by Entropy (4228) on Thursday October 12 2017, @10:47PM (#581404)

    There are windows shot out that are unlikely from the single vantage point. Sound from gunfire can be misinterpreted by folks unfamiliar with it for sure.