Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday October 14 2017, @12:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the follow-the-money dept.

[...] tech companies are under fire for creating problems instead of solving them. At the top of the list is Russian interference in last year's presidential election. Social media might have originally promised liberation, but it proved an even more useful tool for stoking anger. The manipulation was so efficient and so lacking in transparency that the companies themselves barely noticed it was happening.

The election is far from the only area of concern. Tech companies have accrued a tremendous amount of power and influence. Amazon determines how people shop, Google how they acquire knowledge, Facebook how they communicate. All of them are making decisions about who gets a digital megaphone and who should be unplugged from the web.

Their amount of concentrated authority resembles the divine right of kings, and is sparking a backlash that is still gathering force.

Is it that the tech companies are creating problems for society as a whole, or merely disrupting the status quo for the old Powers-That-Be?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by srobert on Saturday October 14 2017, @03:05PM (2 children)

    by srobert (4803) on Saturday October 14 2017, @03:05PM (#582289)

    I was one of those Bernie or Busters that wouldn't vote for Hillary. I didn't realize last November that it was because I'd been brainwashed by Vladimir Putin. I was under the illusion that I was just voting according to my own thinking on the matter. The fact that Russia has access to technology that influenced my vote really grinds my gears. We should just bomb the crap out of them.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Offtopic=1, Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 14 2017, @06:31PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 14 2017, @06:31PM (#582365)

    You say you do your "own thinking on the matter." Yet here you are, discussing the news. You seem to be asserting that your thoughts form in a vacuum. Perhaps through sheer strength of will you ignore what people say to you and what the mass media tell you. If so, you're exceptional. Advertising is effective--else there wouldn't be so much of it. People are influenced by the ideas that are communicated to them.

    Earlier, you wrote: [soylentnews.org]

    He who pays the piper calls the tune. Tune into Fox, CNN, MSNBC, CBS. They all may have a left leaning or right leaning bias on social issues, abortion, gay marriage, gun control. At the end of the day, all of these have a corporate bias because it is the advertisers who are paying for the broadcast. Despite the availability of the internet and a few non-commercial sources of info, most Americans are still getting their news from these sources on their televisions.

    The Russian government sponsored an advertising campaign on Facebook. It sponsors RT and Sputnik News, whence several stories have been posted here. The information--and misinformation--circulating on last year's presidential candidates was influenced by the Russian government. How many opinions were drastically changed [soylentnews.org] by it is unclear.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 15 2017, @01:31AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 15 2017, @01:31AM (#582473)

      You seem to be asserting that your thoughts form in a vacuum. Perhaps through sheer strength of will you ignore what people say to you and what the mass media tell you. If so, you're exceptional. Advertising is effective

      Is there problem with someone being influenced by someone else? If so, does that problem have any bearing on people not actually being able to do their "own thinking on the matter"? If so, what does that say about the US government-run school system, a system in which participation is effectively mandatory and whose funding is done at the point of the guns of US government agents? If so, which is more important to the average person living in the USA: the horrific mind-breaking US schools and related problems here inside the USA, or some foreign entity funding TV shows and buying Facebook ads?