Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Tuesday October 17 2017, @02:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the Ares-and-Harmonia dept.

Cities Dream Of Landing Amazon's New HQ And They're Going To Great Lengths To Show It

Officials in Tucson, Ariz., uprooted a 21-foot-tall saguaro cactus and tried to have it delivered to Amazon's Seattle headquarters. Birmingham constructed giant Amazon boxes and placed them around the Alabama city. In Missouri, Kansas City's mayor bought a thousand items online from Amazon and posted reviews of each one.

All of these cities are clearly trying hard to get Amazon's attention. Why? Because they know that otherwise, they don't stand a chance against some big-name cities that are all trying to win the contest to land Amazon's second headquarters.

The retail giant announced a month ago that it has plans for a second home outside of Seattle, where it is currently headquartered. The project has been named HQ2, and the deadline for final bids is Thursday. Amazon has promised to invest $5 billion and said the facility will create as many as 50,000 jobs.

It has led to a mad scramble from cities across the nation and even in Canada. And various publications have analyzed cities' chances of landing this deal. Atlanta, Denver and Pittsburgh have made it to a few of those lists.

Many cities don't really figure as finalists on any of those lists. But that hasn't stopped them. In fact, just like Tucson or Birmingham, cities are pulling out all the stops to get noticed.

The Amazonk Prometheans may be coming to your city...

Previously: Amazon Spheres Add to Seattle's Quirky Architecture
Amazon Acquires Whole Foods for $13.7 Billion
Amazon to Invest $5 Billion in Second HQ Outside of Seattle
Amazon Looks to New Food Technology for Home Delivery


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2017, @07:34PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2017, @07:34PM (#583616)

    So you're probably thinking that Wisconsin won't recoup all of that $3B corporate welfare handout incentive package they're giving to putting in place for Foxconn?

    FTFY.

  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2017, @08:05PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2017, @08:05PM (#583627)

    Fail. Scott Walker supports it, as does Paul Ryan. They are true blue Republicans and are, by definition, against any kind of welfare. These are tax incentives and breaks that will pay for themselves based upon long-term, sustained growth of at least 3%.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2017, @08:44PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 17 2017, @08:44PM (#583646)

      These are tax incentives and breaks

      Epic fail. The majority of that is cash handouts. NOT tax breaks, NOT incentives. CASH. The EXACT SAME THING the Republicans spend half their time screaming about when given to the poor instead of massive multinational corporations. Walker, Ryan, and the rest of the Republicans are VERY MUCH IN FAVOR of welfare, just not welfare for the poor. Hypocrites, all of them.

      Sources:
      "Wisconsin Senate approves $3 billion cash payment for Foxconn factory" http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-foxconn-20170912-story.html [latimes.com]
      (Emphasis mine)

      But wait, there's more:

      "Foxconn would receive up to $2.85 billion in cash payments from state taxpayers over 15 years..." http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2017/08/16/how-would-wisconsin-foxconn-deal-work-here-some-answers/572186001/ [jsonline.com]
      (Emphasis mine)

      If you want more sources Google it yourself.

      (On a semi-related note, can we have an underline tag please? Pretty please? With a cherry on top? begging_puppy.jpg)