Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday October 18 2017, @02:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the cost-vs-convenience dept.

With Uber and other ridesharing services becoming a common transit option for some D.C. residents, we wanted to get a sense of when someone might substitute an Uber trip for a Metrorail trip. To do this, we plotted data on travel time and cost, creating a visualization that shows whether Uber or Metro is faster, and at what cost, for 114 different trips between Metro stations. By adding in the time it takes to wait for a Metro train or Uber, walk to the Metro, or sit on a delayed train, we can see how a person's decision might change depending on their circumstances.

The trips we analyzed include trips between the city and the suburbs as well as trips within the city.

[...] We found that for longer trips between the center of the city and the suburbs, Metro tends to be both more cost-effective and quicker than Uber. But for trips within the city that require a Metro transfer, Uber is often quicker than Metro, especially when Metro wait times are long, like on weekends, or when there are delays. While Uber's regular service tends to be much more expensive than Metro, Uber Pool makes some Uber trips nearly as affordable as Metro.

Did they factor in the need for a pack train, 3 days' provisions, and sherpas to get up and down the stairs in the Metro?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Wednesday October 18 2017, @02:30PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Wednesday October 18 2017, @02:30PM (#583958)

    "ride sharing" was only ever a typical Uber attempt to obfuscate what they were doing to avoid regulation

    Part true, part not.

    First, there are people who drive for Uber/Lyft who really do have another primary job, and do this on the side to make a few extra dollars, particularly if they have a long commute. But granted, they're not the majority of drivers.

    Secondly, both Uber and Lyft now have true "ride sharing" services that are pretty popular: Uber Pool and Lyft Line. But it's not the driver who's sharing a ride, it's the passengers: different passengers who don't know each other get to share a ride together. These services are cheaper than regular Uber/Lyft, but may take longer because your car can get routed away to pick up or drop off another passenger, but it's much cheaper if you're not in a hurry. Why didn't the cab companies ever think of this first?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2