Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by FatPhil on Thursday October 19 2017, @06:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the unsafe-at-any-typing-speed dept.

Donald Trump has threatened to shut down NBC and other American networks, saying that they peddle fake news.

"With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!" Mr Trump wrote in a tweet.

Mr Trump's tweet came in response to a story written by NBC, which said that Mr Trump had sought to increase America's nuclear arsenal tenfold after taking a look at a briefing slide that showed stead reduction of the US nuclear arsenal since the 1960s. The story cited three officials who were reportedly in the room when Mr Trump made the comments.

Source: Donald Trump threatens to shut down NBC and other TV news networks that criticise him


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by Translation Error on Thursday October 19 2017, @06:50PM (7 children)

    by Translation Error (718) on Thursday October 19 2017, @06:50PM (#584733)
    This story is from over a week ago.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by bob_super on Thursday October 19 2017, @06:52PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday October 19 2017, @06:52PM (#584739)

    It's so old that even FCC chairman Ajit Pai took time off from sucking Verizon dick to react to people blaming him for not addressing it.

  • (Score: 2, Troll) by frojack on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:00PM (5 children)

    by frojack (1554) on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:00PM (#584821) Journal

    And it was wrong over a week agostill wrong today.

    He made no such threat.

    He suggested that people might want to contest the broadcast licenses at the required FCC public hearings when their license is up for renewal if they insist on using public airwaves to only air one side of the story.

    It probably wouldn't work, because a great deal of their coverage is carried by private carriers these days. Still they have broadcast licenses in some markets, and satellite licenses as well that use scarce public resources. It makes more sense to talk to their advertisers.

    In past years I've sent printed letters to my local TV stations complaining about their one-sided news coverage, and asking when their next FCC renewal comment period was scheduled. Got a nice call from two different station managers, both feigning understanding, (but nothing much has changed).

    Broadcast Stations are obligated to announce their renewal dates and comment periods.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 5, Informative) by takyon on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:27PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:27PM (#584848) Journal

      "NBC and the Networks", the bogeyman Trump identified in his tweet [twitter.com], do not have broadcast licenses. The individual local stations do. By all means, try to challenge them. Is there a kind of complaint that would be successful in getting a license revoked other than the station interrupting children's programming to show hardcore pornography?

      We're seeing a lot more 100% lies coming from Trump than 100% fake news coming from the lamestream media. The premise of his tweet was stupid and self-serving (to the extent that a non-starter idea can be self-serving).

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by meustrus on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:32PM

      by meustrus (4961) on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:32PM (#584856)

      That's a good idea. I should call my local station and complain about the clearly one-sided news segments provided by Sinclair. If I wanted the plutocrat's version of conservative takes on current events, I'd turn to Fox News. When will the sheeple wake up and see the blatant right-wing bias in the lamestream media?

      --
      If there isn't at least one reference or primary source, it's not +1 Informative. Maybe the underused +1 Interesting?
    • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:50PM

      by NewNic (6420) on Thursday October 19 2017, @08:50PM (#584872) Journal

      And it was wrong over a week agostill wrong today.

      He made no such threat.

      He suggested that people might want to contest the broadcast licenses at the required FCC public hearings when their license is up for renewal if they insist on using public airwaves to only air one side of the story.

      How about you get your nose out of Trump's ass?

      He did not say that "people" should contest the license. What he said about who should contest the licenses is at best ambiguous. It's right there in the summary.

      --
      lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:35PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:35PM (#584988)

      Do you also send letters to your local Fox stations for their biased coverage? Probably not...

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday October 20 2017, @12:59AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 20 2017, @12:59AM (#585026) Journal

      It probably wouldn't work, because a great deal of their coverage is carried by private carriers these days. Still they have broadcast licenses in some markets, and satellite licenses as well that use scarce public resources. It makes more sense to talk to their advertisers.

      The Fairness Doctrine [wikipedia.org] (the rule that broadcast license holders had to provide some sort of balanced presentation of controversial issues) no longer applies. The rule was done away with in 1987 and finally completely erased [politico.com] in 2011.

      While the commission voted in 1987 to do away with the rule — a legacy to a time when broadcasting was a much more dominant voice than it is today — the language implementing it was never removed. The move Monday, once published in the federal register, effectively erases the rule.

      Monday’s move is part of the commission’s response to a White House executive order directing a “government-wide review of regulations already on the books” designed to eliminate unnecessary regulations.