Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Saturday October 21 2017, @09:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the and-the-fauna? dept.

The last two of eight prototypes for President Donald Trump's proposed border wall took shape Thursday at a construction site in San Diego.

The prototypes, including one built by Israeli defense firm Elta, form a tightly packed row of imposing concrete and metal panels, including one with sharp metal edges on top.

[...] The models, which cost the government up to $500,000 each, were spaced 30 feet (9.1 meters) apart. Slopes, thickness and curves vary. One has two shades of blue with white trim. The others are gray, tan or brown — in sync with the desert.

Bidding guidelines call for the prototypes to stand between 18 and 30 feet (5.5 and 9.1 meters) high and be able to withstand at least an hour of punishment from a sledgehammer, pickaxe, torch, chisel or battery-operated tools.

Features also should prevent the use of climbing aids such as grappling hooks, and the segments must be "aesthetically pleasing" when viewed from the US side.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Saturday October 21 2017, @01:35PM (3 children)

    by looorg (578) on Saturday October 21 2017, @01:35PM (#585655)

    The model or prototype might be $500k each, that doesn't mean that the finished or fabricated segments will be $500k each. There is clearly not enough materials or labor cost in there for that price, so this will just be the prototype and R&D costs.

    I don't recall now what has been said but the wall is probably not going to be put EXACTLY on the spot of the actual border, I assume it will be a little inside the US-side so there is a bit of US on both sides of the wall. Enough room for a mine field perhaps or the option to shoot to kill anything that gets close to the wall. So if they start shooting RPG:s at the wall from the Mexican side I think this will quite quickly escalate and you'll start to see more armed patrols that will shoot to kill anything that even gets close to the wall, there will be actual working mine fields etc.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @03:21PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @03:21PM (#585678)

    Enough room for a mine field perhaps or the option to shoot to kill anything that gets close to the wall.

    I see you support extra-judicial killings as well as judge-jury-and-executioner powers for those you whom you, mistakenly, think would welcome you in their 'in-group'.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday October 22 2017, @02:29AM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday October 22 2017, @02:29AM (#585848)

      See, I wonder if Trump even knows about the wall that came down in 1989? That one started construction in 1961 and had a pretty successful run reducing border crossings for 28 years. A lot to learn from that experience: frontier zones, shoot to kill towers, etc. Also: what people on both sides thought of it, and what that ultimately did to the empire which tried to maintain it.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @11:06PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21 2017, @11:06PM (#585812)

    The model or prototype might be $500k each, that doesn't mean that the finished or fabricated segments will be $500k each.

    As you say, those are the costs for the models or prototypes. As for the wall itself, the article tells us:

    Trump has asked Congress for $1.6 billion to replace 14 miles of wall (22.4 kilometers) in San Diego and build 60 miles (96 kilometers) in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley, the busiest corridor for illegal crossings.

    That comes to, in round numbers, $13,500 per meter or $12,350 per yard ($135 per cm or $343 per inch).