Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Sunday October 22 2017, @09:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the FIRE-sector-doing-bad-math-again dept.

The Intercept reports:

Bank of America Merrill Lynch downgraded Chipotle and warned investors that the stock will "underperform", complaining that the restaurant chain is paying its workers too much, and that cutting labor costs further will be difficult for the chain.

[...] Chipotle spokesperson Chris Arnold called Bank of America's analysis "flawed and inaccurate", adding that the restaurant chain hasn't cut employee hours but recently increased hours in conjunction with the addition of queso to the menu.

"That analysis is making estimates and conclusions about our management practices over a 12-year time frame from 2006 to 2017", Arnold told The Intercept. "Obviously, the scale of our business and labor wages have changed dramatically over that time frame. Drawing conclusions from 2006 and applying them as a directional change to our business over the past 12 months is simply flawed."

[...] "We continue to pay wages and offer benefits that are competitive and that reflect the priorities of our employees", Arnold said. "And with a commitment to developing and promoting people from within, we are providing significant opportunities for advancement."

The downgrade is a symptom of Wall Street's maniacal obsession with labor costs.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 22 2017, @06:19PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 22 2017, @06:19PM (#586001)

    Chipotle could overpay on many things, and get great deals on other things. What does it matter? The final numbers are what the banks should care about.

    If the bank actually knew how to run a profitable restaurant, then it would be profitable for them to do so. Well? Start cooking food and prove it.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 23 2017, @01:12AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 23 2017, @01:12AM (#586111)

    ...instead of producing NOTHING, like the rest of the FIRE sector (Financial/Insurance/Real Estate).

    {Advocacy for public banks goes here}

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 23 2017, @05:46PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 23 2017, @05:46PM (#586446)

      So start one. OK, you're not in government, from what I understand, so do the next best thing: a non-profit bank. Cash returns over necessary reserve figures get redistributed to your depositors. Public accounts all the way.

      You can do it! And make it a co-op too!

      • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Monday October 23 2017, @06:28PM

        by urza9814 (3954) on Monday October 23 2017, @06:28PM (#586477) Journal

        So start one. OK, you're not in government, from what I understand, so do the next best thing: a non-profit bank. Cash returns over necessary reserve figures get redistributed to your depositors. Public accounts all the way.

        You can do it! And make it a co-op too!

        Isn't that just a credit union? Just join an existing one -- If everyone is starting their own that kinda defeats the purpose! :)