A California judge has thrown out a $417 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson. The plaintiff claimed that she developed ovarian cancer after using J&J's talc-based products:
The ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maren Nelson marked the latest setback facing women and family members who accuse J&J of not adequately warning consumers about the cancer risks of its talc-based products. The decision followed a jury's decision in August to hit J&J with the largest verdict to date in the litigation, awarding California resident Eva Echeverria $70 million in compensatory damages and $347 million in punitive damages.
Nelson on Friday reversed the jury verdict and granted J&J's request for a new trial. Nelson said the August trial was underpinned by errors and insufficient evidence on both sides, culminating in excessive damages.
Mark Robinson, who represented the woman in her lawsuit, in a statement said he would file an appeal immediately. "We will continue to fight on behalf of all women who have been impacted by this dangerous product," he said.
Previously: The Baby Powder Trials: How Courts Deal with Inconclusive Science
Johnson & Johnson Ordered to Pay $417m in Latest Talc Cancer Case
(Score: 2) by Hartree on Sunday October 22 2017, @08:53PM (1 child)
We have excellent evidence that oxygen causes death from cancer. How so? Anyone deprived of oxygen does not die of cancer. They may well have cancer but vanishingly few of those deprived of oxygen die of the cancer.
I demand that those companies that supply oxygen, Airgas, Linde, Praxair and all the hospitals pay me half a billion dollars to punish them for endangering my life and causing any cancer I have to become fatal.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 23 2017, @06:44AM
Unfortunately a common side effect is a reduced life expectancy ;).