SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be smarter and more attentive than I am. I found I must be careful when working with static analysis tools. Code reported by the analyzer often looks fine and I'm tempted to discard the warning as a false positive and move on. I fell into this trap and failed to spot bugs...Even I, one of the PVS-Studio developers.
So, appreciate and use static code analyzers! They will help save your time and nerve cells.
[Ed note: I debated running this story as there was an element of self-promotion (aka Bin Spam), but the submitter has been with the site for a while and has posted informative comments. Besides, I know there have been far too many times when I've seen a compiler complain about some section of my code and I'm thinking there is nothing wrong with it — and then I, finally, see my mistake. Anyone have samples of code where you just knew the compiler or static analyzer was wrong, only to find out otherwise? --martyb]
(Score: 4, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday October 23 2017, @10:43AM (9 children)
Let's use your analogy then. I'm not saying you should agree with all the compiler warnings. I'm saying it's moronic beyond belief to turn them off.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 23 2017, @01:57PM (5 children)
Nah, I think you're a secret little fascist hiding behind "libertarian" ideas. Your behavior fits that of the alt-right, equivocate and outright lie/troll. Pretend to be clueless, pull in some suckers, then use horribly bad logic to spread shitty world views.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday October 23 2017, @03:34PM (4 children)
Actions speak louder than words, so they say. Check mine. Spam aside, you'll find me standing for free speech every time it's in question. That the regressive left are the only ones calling for the speech policing does not make me any flavor of "right". It just makes you the fascists you claim to oppose.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 28 2017, @07:43AM (3 children)
the regressive left are the only ones calling for the speech policing
[02:22:05] Bytram, Fnord666: you gotta be shitting me with the aristarchus sub
[02:25:35] how in the fuck did we decide to run a blatant hatchet piece by the NYT, subbed by aristarchus with his own smarmy bullshit thrown in to boot?
[02:30:44] we're seriously going to let dipshit paint half the country with his nazi brush?
[02:32:12] fuck's sake. there are less than a hundred thousand white supremacists in the entire country of 350+ million. this is some shit i'd expect slate to run not us.
[02:57:05] -!- TheMightyBuzzard has quit [Quit: Leaving]
[02:57:48] -!- TheMightyBuzzard [TheMightyBuzzard!~TheMighty@Soylent/Staff/Developer/TMB] has joined #editorial
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday October 28 2017, @10:13AM (2 children)
And? You believe getting whatever you submit on the front page is an entitlement now, eh?
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 28 2017, @12:45PM (1 child)
While The Mighty Buzzard denounces speech policing, TheMightyBuzzard indulges in it. One insists he's not an editor; the other pressures the editors concerning which stories to run.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday October 28 2017, @11:07PM
There's a difference between being able to speak your mind and spray painting dicks all over someone's house.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Monday October 23 2017, @09:36PM (2 children)
I'm a believer in zero-warning compiles for release code. It doesn't solve every problem, but in my own code I see compiler warnings catching multiple bugs per year that would otherwise be getting by. On the other hand, there are some warnings in some situations that just don't mean anything valuable and can be turned off, in fact are better turned off, so as not to distract from the real warnings that mean something, and also to save the programmers from unreasonable syntactic gymnastics just to shut them up.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday October 23 2017, @11:05PM (1 child)
To each their own. What you call "unreasonable syntactic gymnastics" could just as well be called "doing things properly so you don't make a noobass mistake" though. Like with speech, every time you refuse to listen you eliminate the chance of finding out you're wrong and being able to correct yourself.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday October 23 2017, @11:52PM
I'm o.k. with (void) casting unused variables and similar simple things, but some of the signed/unsigned warnings and other more esoteric type casting stuff can get pretty crazy looking to "do it right" when the simple, warned, code is very straightforward to read and understand.
🌻🌻 [google.com]