Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday October 23 2017, @01:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the tactical-advance-away-from-them dept.

The Guardian, The New York Times, Al-Jazeera over the decision of USA and Israel to withdraw from UNESCO over 'anti-Israel bias'

The Guardian

The United States has formally notified the UN's world heritage body Unesco that it is withdrawing its membership of the organisation citing "continuing anti-Israel bias".
The announcement by the Trump administration was followed a few hours later by news that Israel was also planning to quit the financially struggling cultural and educational agency.
...
The body is best known for its world heritage listings of outstanding cultural and natural sites but has often drawn the ire of Israel and the Trump administration for a series of decisions, including the listing of Hebron, a city in the southern part of the occupied Palestinian territories, as a Palestinian world heritage site.
...
Disclosing the US government's decision, the state department said in a statement it would seek to "remain engaged ... as a non-member observer state in order to contribute US views, perspectives and expertise".

The statement added: "This decision was not taken lightly, and reflects US concerns with mounting arrears at Unesco, the need for fundamental reform in the organisation, and continuing anti-Israel bias at Unesco," the US state department said. The withdrawal will take effect on 31 December 2018.

The New York Times

The administration also cited mounting arrears at the organization as a reason for the decision.

"We were in arrears to the tune of $550 million or so, and so the question is, do we want to pay that money?" Heather Nauert, a spokeswoman for the State Department, said Thursday at a news briefing. She added, "With this anti-Israel bias that's long documented on the part of Unesco, that needs to come to an end."
...

Cultural organizations in the United States criticized the decision, saying Unesco played a key role in preserving vital cultural heritage worldwide.

"Although Unesco may be an imperfect organization, it has been an important leader and steadfast partner in this crucial work," said Daniel H. Weiss, the president and chief executive of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
...
Analysts said that withdrawing from the organization was a significant escalation by the United States in its criticism of United Nations bodies.

"This is another example of the Trump's administration's profound ambivalence and concern about the way the U.N. is structured and behaves," said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator and adviser in Republican and Democratic administrations.

In July, Unesco declared the ancient and hotly contested core of Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, as a Palestinian World Heritage site in danger, a decision sharply criticized by Israel and its allies. And in 2015, Unesco adopted a resolution that criticized Israel for mishandling heritage sites in Jerusalem and condemned "Israeli aggressions and illegal measures against freedom of worship."

Al-Jazeera

In a statement announcing its withdrawal, Israel called the US administration's decision "courageous and moral", and accused UNESCO of becoming a "theatre of the absurd".

"The prime minister instructed the foreign ministry to prepare Israel's withdrawal from the organisation alongside the United States," Benjamin Netayanu's office said in a statement.
...

Thursday's development demonstrates the US administration's "complete and total bias" towards Israel, says Mustafa Barghouti, secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative, a political party comprising mostly secular intellectuals.

"This behaviour is counterproductive and shameful," he told Al Jazeera by phone. "Sooner or later they will see Palestine in every UN agency. Will the US respond to that by withdrawing from the WHO or the World Intellectual Property Organization? They will be hurting only themselves."
...
Russia's foreign ministry said it regreted the decision, adding that the move would disrupt a number of important projects planned by UNESCO.

"We share the concern by many countries that the activity of UNESCO has been too politicised lately," the ministry said in a statement.
...
Barghouti, of the Palestinian National Initiative, said it is "as if Israel is dictating US policy not only in the Middle East but also in international organisations.

"This is going to have a very harmful effect on the idea of the US being a mediator between the Palestinians and the Israelis."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Troll) by RamiK on Tuesday October 24 2017, @03:25AM (3 children)

    by RamiK (1813) on Tuesday October 24 2017, @03:25AM (#586704)

    By violated almost immediately, don't you mean got attacked by all the nations surrounding it in violation of the very same UN decision that you're defending and ended up with more territories then Israel was designated for? Moreover, are you seriously suggesting the world should send the message that whenever a UN resolution passes, it's OK to try and force a different result by genociding your neighbors since, worse case scenario, the same resolution will still apply and you won't end up worse off than when you started?

    3. The only reason those condemnations ever got a majority was with the knowledge that the US will veto them regardless making them a good way to placate the oil-providing Arab nations over the UN unwillingness to actually its decisions in the region.

    4. The Geneva conventions is a fine legal document that was signed between fine nations that largely ignored it as soon as war broke out.

    5. See my other post. But also, there's historical and religious significance to every pile of rubble in the region so I'm not sure what "one of the 4 holy cities of Islam" suggests. I'm pretty sure even if those cities were under Muslim governance, the Caliphate would still be required to expand under every interpretation of Sharia law I've read. So, I really don't see how any of this leads to peace in the middle east.

    --
    compiling...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 24 2017, @09:10AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 24 2017, @09:10AM (#586786)

    By violated almost immediately, don't you mean got attacked by all the nations surrounding it

    No. Violating it means occupying it for 50+ years and de-facto annexing it.

    I will not even raise the problems of Israel's ethnic cleansing of Arab populations few decades ago, or current policy of forcing Arab populations into ever smaller areas.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ethnic_Cleansing_of_Palestine [wikipedia.org]

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday October 24 2017, @01:51PM (1 child)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday October 24 2017, @01:51PM (#586848) Journal

    By violated almost immediately, don't you mean got attacked by all the nations surrounding it in violation of the very same UN decision that you're defending and ended up with more territories then Israel was designated for? Moreover, are you seriously suggesting the world should send the message that whenever a UN resolution passes, it's OK to try and force a different result by genociding your neighbors since, worse case scenario, the same resolution will still apply and you won't end up worse off than when you started?

    Oh yes, because the Zionist terrorists in Haganah, Irgun, and Lehi hadn't engaged in many decades of a terror campaign to force that UN resolution as a way to settle the sitation they inflamed. (as an aside: the PLA picked up their playbook of using terror to achieve a homeland because it had worked so fantastically well for the Zionists.) The poor, poor Zionist terrorists, such victims of their horrible mean neighbors for retaliating against decades of Jewish terrorism, right? They are such innocent victims.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.