Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 9 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Monday October 23 2017, @10:10PM   Printer-friendly
from the world's-tiniest-violin-ringtone dept.

FBI failed to access 7,000 encrypted mobile devices

Agents at the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have been unable to extract data from nearly 7,000 mobile devices they have tried to access, the agency's director has said.

Christopher Wray said encryption on devices was "a huge, huge problem" for FBI investigations. The agency had failed to access more than half of the devices it targeted in an 11-month period, he said.

One cyber-security expert said such encryption was now a "fact of life". Many smartphones encrypt their contents when locked, as standard - a security feature that often prevents even the phones' manufacturers from accessing data. Such encryption is different to end-to-end encryption, which prevents interception of communications on a large scale.

Cyber-security expert Prof Alan Woodward at the University of Surrey said device encryption was clearly frustrating criminal investigations but it would be impractical and insecure to develop "back doors" or weakened security.

In a time when the government is committing criminal acts, is it not advisable for citizens to do what they can to protect themselves from that crime?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by hemocyanin on Tuesday October 24 2017, @05:06AM (3 children)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Tuesday October 24 2017, @05:06AM (#586725) Journal

    Which brands did they fail to access? That's what I want to know.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 24 2017, @07:27AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 24 2017, @07:27AM (#586753)

    Sorry that information can not be revealed because it would help the terrorists and gangbanger pedophiles on PCP win.

    You can't withhold secrets from the government but they can sure withhold secrets from you.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by DannyB on Tuesday October 24 2017, @02:43PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 24 2017, @02:43PM (#586876) Journal

      would help the terrorists and gangbanger pedophiles on PCP win.

      Did you mean PHP? Oh, wait. Nevermind.

      --
      When trying to solve a problem don't ask who suffers from the problem, ask who profits from the problem.
  • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Wednesday October 25 2017, @01:37PM

    by urza9814 (3954) on Wednesday October 25 2017, @01:37PM (#587359) Journal

    Which brands did they fail to access? That's what I want to know.

    The ones they decided weren't worth the cost/effort of full analysis.

    7,000 phones that they "failed to access" could mean nothing more than a field agent hitting the unlock button, getting a password prompt, and deciding they didn't have enough evidence for a warrant or they had enough to lock the person up already and it therefore wasn't worth paying for their crypto experts to fully analyze that phone.