SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the add-your-own-butter-and-salt dept.
Submitted via IRC for SoyGuest31999
In an October 19 letter to corn-belt lawmakers, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt said that he won't seek any rollback to biofuel blending rules, according to Reuters.
The agency had been considering some changes to rules set by the Obama administration that ratchet up the amount of renewable biofuel that refineries must blend into the gas and diesel they sell. According to Bloomberg, the EPA had specifically been considering "a possible reduction in biodiesel requirements" as well as "a proposal to allow exported renewable fuel to count toward domestic quotas." In early October, the EPA asked for public comment on cutting biodiesel quotas.
The Bloomberg story cited unnamed sources who said President Trump personally directed Pruitt to back off any proposals that would relax biofuel quotas after pressure from lawmakers from corn-producing states like Iowa, Nebraska, and Illinois. Trump, who courted both fossil fuel interests and corn-belt states in his campaign, has had pressure from each side on this debate. Uncertainty surrounding the future of biofuel use during Trump's administration has caused volatility in biofuels markets for months, Reuters notes.
(The Bloomberg story also cites one unnamed "top EPA official" who said that Trump's directive to Pruitt didn't matter because Pruitt wasn't going to alter renewable fuel standards anyway.)
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday October 26 2017, @02:21PM
The government can stay out of their lives, as long as they're pumping in the cash via "working" channels like land ownership: the CRP program pays landowners substantial amounts to NOT farm their land - artificially propping up the value of the land, farm subsidies stabilize market prices and buy excess product in surplus years, and of course programs like mandatory ethanol in gasoline create demand where it never existed in the free market.
We could go on about how infrastructure like roads, electricity, telecommunications, etc. are not cost effective to deliver in the rural areas, but our government taxes the cities to fund infrastructure in the rural areas, etc. But, let's not give a single dime to those lazy city dwellers who don't have a job to pay for their rent and food.
🌻🌻 [google.com]