Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 27 2017, @01:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the and-make-water-from-hydrazine dept.

Mars colonists could create a carbon dioxide plasma in order to supply oxygen to their settlement(s):

The atmosphere on Mars is 96 per cent carbon dioxide, says Vasco Guerra at the University of Lisbon in Portugal. This can be split to extract breathable oxygen and carbon monoxide, a fuel that could give us a "gas station on the Red Planet", he says. He and his team calculate that creating a carbon dioxide plasma — a mush of ions made by passing an electric current through a gas — could split carbon dioxide from oxygen more easily on Mars than on Earth.

The lower atmospheric pressure on Mars would allow us to create plasmas without the vacuum pumps or compressors necessary on Earth. Also, the temperature of around -60°C is just right to let the plasma more easily break one of the chemical bonds that keeps carbon and oxygen tightly bound, while preventing the carbon dioxide from re-forming.

For now, this is largely theoretical, but they say such a system needing only 150 to 200 Watts for 4 hours each 25-hour Mars day could produce 8 to 16 kilograms of oxygen. "The International Space Station currently consumes oxygen in the range of 2 to 5 kilograms per day, so this would be enough to support a small settlement," says Guerra.

The case for in situ resource utilisation for oxygen production on Mars by nonequilibrium plasmas (open, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Friday October 27 2017, @08:15PM (3 children)

    by t-3 (4907) on Friday October 27 2017, @08:15PM (#588403)

    "Plants need light" isn't entirely true, and with modern bioengineering we could probably improve low-light growth, although that may not be necessary, as humans require much the same amount of light. Lots of plants would be necessary regardless, as food must be produced somehow, and lifting tons of food out of a gravity well isn't going to be economical anytime soon.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 28 2017, @03:19AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 28 2017, @03:19AM (#588542)

    Not economically viable? Don't forget me!

    They said it's because I'm over educated and under skilled, or maybe its the other way around, I get confused about it.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 29 2017, @03:02AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 29 2017, @03:02AM (#588893)

    >"Plants need light" isn't entirely true

    Are you thinking of fungi as plants? Photosynthesis needs light.

    >and with modern bioengineering we could probably improve low-light growth

    On Mars, sunlight is 44% as bright [colorado.edu] as on Earth. Plants that are well-adapted to that amount of light already exist, because we have forests on Earth.

    • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Sunday October 29 2017, @04:26AM

      by t-3 (4907) on Sunday October 29 2017, @04:26AM (#588923)

      Not all plants require photosynthesis. Never did that "grow $X in a dark closet" grade-school science experiment? With appropriate nutrition etc, a lot of stuff can be grown without sunlight.