SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1
Trump's Department of Justice is trying to get a do-over with its campaign to get backdoors onto iPhones and into secure messaging services. The policy rebrand even has its own made-up buzzword. They're calling it "responsible encryption."
After Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein introduced the term in his speech to the U.S. Naval Academy, most everyone who read the transcript was doing spit-takes at their computer monitors. From hackers and infosec professionals to attorneys and tech journalists, "responsible encryption" sounded like a marketing plan to sell unsweetened sugar to diabetics.
Government officials -- not just in the U.S. but around the world -- have always been cranky that they can't access communications that use end-to-end encryption, whether that's Signal or the kind of encryption that protects an iPhone. The authorities are vexed, they say, because encryption without a backdoor impedes law-enforcement investigations, such as when terrorist acts occur.
[...] "Look, it's real simple. Encryption is good for our national security; it's good for our economy. We should be strengthening encryption, not weakening it. And it's technically impossible to have strong encryption with any kind of backdoor," said Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas), when asked about Rosenstein's proposal for responsible encryption at The Atlantic's Cyber Frontier event in Washington, D.C.
Source: Great, now there's 'responsible encryption'
(Score: 3, Informative) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday October 31 2017, @12:29AM
They cause harm to to the US itself by violating the highest law of the land. The people in these organizations who violate the Constitution and the ones who are responsible for their treacherous actions should be in prison, or they would be if our system made sense at all. Mass surveillance should be completely banned in all circumstances, as not only is it a violation of people's freedoms (whether foreign or not), but it makes it impossible to avoid collecting the data of actual citizens given the global nature of the Internet.
The problem of the government violating the Constitution inherently does far more damage than any amount of terrorists or foreign powers could ever do, so the mere fact that the NSA is violating the Constitution makes it evil to me.