Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday November 02 2017, @07:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the fire-up-the-VPN dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1

Verizon was one of several giant ISPs that paid lobbied the GOP and Trump administration to gut consumer broadband privacy rules earlier this year. Lawmakers admitted they utilized the public's focus on losing health care to quickly dismantle the rules, which would have required ISPs be more transparent about what personal data is collected and sold, and provide working opt out tools for those interested in privacy. The rules were crafted after Verizon was caught covertly tracking users around the internet and AT&T tried to make privacy a luxury option for an additional fee.

After killing the rules, numerous states came forth with their own privacy proposals, and ISP lobbyists have been busy trying to kill those, as well.

Lobbyists for Google, Verizon, Comcast and AT&T collectively killed one such proposal in California, after falsely telling lawmakers the new law would embolden nazis, increase pop ups, and harm consumers. Now Verizon is taking things one step further, by lobbying the FCC to step in and prevent states from protecting consumer privacy.

In a letter and white paper sent last week to the FCC (pdf), Verizon insists the FCC has ample authority to pre-empt state efforts to protect consumer privacy, and should act to prevent states from doing so.

"Allowing every State and locality to chart its own course for regulating broadband is a recipe for disaster," cries Verizon. "It would impose localized and likely inconsistent burdens on an inherently interstate service, would drive up costs, and would frustrate federal efforts to encourage investment and deployment by restoring the free market that long characterized Internet access service."

Source: http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Verizon-Wants-FCC-to-Ban-States-From-Protecting-Your-Privacy-140625


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday November 03 2017, @04:35PM (1 child)

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday November 03 2017, @04:35PM (#591723)

    Pro-states when it's time to let states makes laws against muni broadband.
    Pro-small-gov when it's time to prevent states from making laws allowing muni broadband.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Friday November 03 2017, @05:32PM

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Friday November 03 2017, @05:32PM (#591758) Homepage Journal

    Ajit Pai, my FCC guy, loves municipal broadband. But he says Title II, the net neutrality, has been holding it back horribly. So he's repealing that. I have no opinion on municipal broadband. It’s like the transgenders. It's a new issue and right now I just don’t have an opinion, but what I would like to do is see the states make that decision. But I'm committed to eliminating regulations that are unnecessary, burdensome and harmful to the economy. To easing the regulatory burden on individuals, companies and governments. Including the governments of Bagley, Minnesota and Tullahoma, Tennessee. Believe me, we’re going to get real results when it comes to removing job-killing regulations and unleashing economic opportunity. #MAGA 🇺🇸