Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Tuesday November 07 2017, @04:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the AMD-Inside™ dept.

Intel squeezed an AMD graphics chip, RAM and CPU into one module

the new processor integrates a "semi-custom" AMD graphics chip and the second generation of Intel's "High Bandwidth Memory (HBM2)", which is comparable to GDDR5 in a traditional laptop.

Intel CPU and AMD GPU, together at last

Summary of Intel's news:

The new product, which will be part of our 8th Gen Intel Core family, brings together our high-performing Intel Core H-series processor, second generation High Bandwidth Memory (HBM2) and a custom-to-Intel third-party discrete graphics chip from AMD's Radeon Technologies Group* – all in a single processor package.

[...] At the heart of this new design is EMIB (Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge), a small intelligent bridge that allows heterogeneous silicon to quickly pass information in extremely close proximity. EMIB eliminates height impact as well as manufacturing and design complexities, enabling faster, more powerful and more efficient products in smaller sizes. This is the first consumer product that takes advantage of EMIB.

[...] Additionally, this solution is the first mobile PC to use HBM2, which consumes much less power and takes up less space compared to traditional discrete graphics-based designs using dedicated graphics memory, like GDDR5 memory.

takyon: This is more like an "integrated discrete GPU" than standard integrated graphics. It also avoids the need for Intel to license AMD's IP. AMD also needs to make a lot of parts since its wafer supply agreement with GlobalFoundries penalizes AMD if they buy less than a target number of wafers each year.

Also at AnandTech and Ars Technica.

Previously: AMD Stock Surges on Report of Intel Graphics Licensing Deal, 16-Core Ryzen Confirmed

Related: Samsung Increases Production of 8 GB High Bandwidth Memory 2.0 Stacks


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 07 2017, @09:08AM (10 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 07 2017, @09:08AM (#593562)

    So Intel effectively admits that its own graphics is worse than AMD's?

    BTW, the "Slow Down Cowboy" message should be placed somewhere where you actually can see it not only by accident.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by TheRaven on Tuesday November 07 2017, @10:45AM (7 children)

    by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @10:45AM (#593591) Journal
    I don't think that's a shock to anyone. There were basically two high-end discrete GPU vendors left: nVidia and ATi. Then AMD bought ATi. If Intel wants to be in this space, then they have three choices: Invest a lot more in their GPU division, buy nVidia or license nVidia GPUs, or license AMD GPUs. Buying nVidia would likely hit a lot of antitrust issues (and there's also a lot of nVidia that Intel doesn't want). This was a pretty obvious move for Intel, if they could manage to persuade AMD to agree to it. From AMD's perspective, it has up and down sides: on the plus side, it's probably getting AMD GPUs to a lot more customers. On the down side, their on-die GPUs were one of their major competitive advantages over Intel. I guess they figured that the increase in GPU sales would offset the loss in CPU sales.
    --
    sudo mod me up
    • (Score: 2) by Spamalope on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:12AM (4 children)

      by Spamalope (5233) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:12AM (#593595) Homepage

      The chips may be destined to a market AMD doesn't have any penetration into so it won't cannibalize sales.
      On the other hand, perhaps they're hoping Intel won't invest as heavily in their own solutions and that the product will be very successful. A few generations later AMD would be in a much better negotiating position. (aka, use this to cut off the air supply for any other cheap embedded solutions)

      • (Score: 2) by tonyPick on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:18AM (3 children)

        by tonyPick (1237) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:18AM (#593598) Homepage Journal

        Be interesting to see how it stacks against Ryzen Mobile though - this looks like a fairly direct competitor there.

        https://www.amd.com/en/products/ryzen-processors-laptop [amd.com]

        • (Score: 4, Interesting) by TheRaven on Tuesday November 07 2017, @05:04PM (2 children)

          by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @05:04PM (#593720) Journal
          That link indicates that not only is AMD not supporting LPDDR, they don't even realise that it's a requirement for a lot of the mobile market. A 15W TDP is nice for the CPU, but if it has to be coupled with 12W-at-idle RAM instead of 2W-at-idle RAM then it's suddenly much less interesting.
          --
          sudo mod me up
          • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:48PM (1 child)

            by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:48PM (#593883) Journal

            DDR4 [slickdeals.net] vs. LPDDR4 [slickdeals.net]

            LPDDR4 in a laptop seems like a goddamn unicorn to me. So it clearly does not matter.

            --
            [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
            • (Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Wednesday November 08 2017, @10:14AM

              by TheRaven (270) on Wednesday November 08 2017, @10:14AM (#594005) Journal
              LPDDR3 is common in laptops, LPDDR4 isn't because no laptop CPUs yet support it (Intel's Cannonlake will, and was originally due to be released 9 months ago, but is now delayed for another 3-6 months). When it's finally released, Intel's mobile chips will support 32GB of LPDDR. A lot of people are eagerly awaiting that, because laptops have been stuck with either 16GB of RAM or really crappy battery life for over four years, which is longer than most corporate upgrade cycles. If RAM is a limiting factor for your workloads, Cannonlake is going to be a big deal. AMD's offerings don't even support LPDDR3, so can't compete in the low-power space with Intel.
              --
              sudo mod me up
    • (Score: 2) by richtopia on Tuesday November 07 2017, @04:33PM (1 child)

      by richtopia (3160) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @04:33PM (#593704) Homepage Journal

      The Anandtech article speculates that these chips will still have the Intel graphics on-die for low power applications. Intel has never sold their GPU independent of a mobo or CPU, so they realize that they have a niche. But they do dominate that low power space. In addition, Intel can leverage these cores for non-display applications such as video encoding (Intel Quick Sync Video) or allowing an additional monitor to be attached.

      It will be interesting if AMD ever brings something to this market segment (mobile 45W CPU with graphics) and how it would compete on low power applications. However I suspect AMD's marketing team realizes they can only compete with Intel directly in certain segments, and I doubt high performance mobile will be one of them.

  • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:14AM (1 child)

    by Wootery (2341) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @11:14AM (#593596)

    So Intel effectively admits that its own graphics is worse than AMD's?

    Well, sure. Intel is doing pretty well considering where they used to be (awful embedded graphics), but they're not seriously competing with the big boys.

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday November 07 2017, @05:42PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday November 07 2017, @05:42PM (#593737)

      Just when Intel Graphics were getting "good enough" for HD, the industry moved to 4K...
      Got some catching up to do (in performance, since they still have the lead in volume), and in the meantime propping up AMD a bit keeps the regulators (not the US obviously, but the ROW) at bay while not making an impact on the bottom line.