Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday November 10 2017, @04:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the hackers-paradise dept.

Facebook to Fight Revenge Porn by Letting Potential Victims Upload Nudes in Advance

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

This new protection system works similar to the anti-child-porn detection systems in use at Facebook, and other social media giants like Google, Twitter, Instagram, and others.

It works on a database of file hashes, a cryptographic signature computed for each file.

Facebook says that once an abuser tries to upload an image marked as "revenge porn" in its database, its system will block the upload process. This will work for images shared on the main Facebook service, but also for images shared privately via Messenger, Facebook's IM app. Potential victims will need to upload nude photos of themselves

The weird thing is that in order to build a database of "revenge porn" file hashes, Facebook will rely on potential victims uploading a copy of the nude photo in advance.

This process involves the victim sending a copy of the nude photo to his own account, via Facebook Messenger. This implies uploading a copy of the nude photo on Facebook Messenger, the very same act the victim is trying to prevent.

The victim can then report the photo to Facebook, which will create a hash of the image that the social network will use to block further uploads of the same photo.

This is possible because in April this year, Facebook modified its image reporting process to take into account images showing "revenge porn" acts.

Facebook says it's not storing a copy of the photo, but only computing the file's hash and adding it to its database of revenge porn imagery.

Victims who fear that former or current partners may upload a nude photo online can pro-actively take this step to block the image from ever being uploaded on Facebook and shared among friends.

We won't be doing this. I don't even want to see hashes of you folks naked.

Source: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/facebook-to-fight-revenge-porn-by-letting-potential-victims-upload-nudes-in-advance/

Facebook asks Australians to send nude photos, for safety

"Worried that an ex-boyfriend or girlfriend might post your intimate photos on the internet? Facebook says it has a solution – as long as you'll hand over the photos first.

The social media giant recently announced its new plan to combat "revenge porn," when individuals post nude photos online without the consent of the subject." http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/11/08/facebook-says-it-needs-your-explicit-photos-to-combat-revenge-porn.html


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday November 10 2017, @05:42PM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 10 2017, @05:42PM (#595219) Journal

    There is that. The most valid reason that the military had for banning homosexuals, was that they could be blackmailed. Let the homos make the fact that they are homosexual public knowledge, suddenly, they can't be blackmailed for being homos.

    On the other hand, ugly people probably don't want to post their ugly asses for the world to see.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday November 10 2017, @06:08PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday November 10 2017, @06:08PM (#595237) Homepage Journal

    Ron. Jeremy.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday November 10 2017, @06:09PM (2 children)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday November 10 2017, @06:09PM (#595238) Homepage

    I disagree. I do agree that blackmail the most valid reason the military (and other agencies) had for disqualifying gays from a security clearance, but the more obvious reason from the military perspective is that they didn't want buttsex and dyking out all over the place. It's difficult to keep discipline when you're surrounded by naked people you're attracted to.

    Funny that, as some armies of antiquity encouraged "brotherly love."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 10 2017, @10:12PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 10 2017, @10:12PM (#595374)

      ...prejudice dies hard, and the military—and its socially conservative supporters—were not about to let the inconvenient truth get in the way of their bias. They came up with a series of rationales for discrimination, each of which eventually fell: gay people were dubbed a security risk; then criminal; then mentally ill; then a threat to the family; then weak warriors; then a source of discomfort for the fragile egos of straight troops; then a medical risk in the time of AIDS; then tramplers of privacy. Finally, champions of military tradition devised the argument that gay people in uniform were a threat to unit cohesion and military readiness...

      (Slate [slate.com])

      I'm not a soldier, but I would imagine that "brotherly love" could actually promote "unit cohesion."

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 11 2017, @01:25PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 11 2017, @01:25PM (#595571)

        Up until the first jealous fight because so-and-so fucked so-and-so, and so-and-so is mine!