Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday November 14 2017, @08:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-wonder-I-couldn't-get-tickets dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

When Adele fans went online to buy tickets to the pop superstar's world tour last year, they had no idea what exactly they were up against.

An army of tech-savvy resellers that included a little-known Canadian superscalper named Julien Lavallée managed to vacuum up thousands of tickets in a matter of minutes in one of the quickest tour sellouts in history.

The many fans who were shut out would have to pay scalpers like Lavallée a steep premium if they still wanted to see their favourite singer.

An investigation by CBC/Radio-Canada and the Toronto Star, based in part on documents found in the Paradise Papers, rips the lid off Lavallée's multimillion-dollar operation based out of Quebec and reveals how ticket website StubHub not only enables but rewards industrial-scale scalpers who gouge fans around the world.

CBC News obtained sales records from three U.K. shows that provide unprecedented insight into the speed and scale of Lavallée's ticket scam.

Despite a four-ticket-per-customer limit, his business snatched up 310 seats in 25 minutes, charged to 15 different names in 12 different locations.

The grand total? Nearly $52,000 worth of tickets at face value.

Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/paradise-papers-stubhub-1.4395361


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by theluggage on Tuesday November 14 2017, @10:41PM (12 children)

    by theluggage (1797) on Tuesday November 14 2017, @10:41PM (#597029)

    Selling tickets in the first place is the creation of artificial scarcity and that in turn reflects the real scarcity of limited space for the audience.

    There is a physical limit to the number of concerts a particular singer can put on. There is a limit to the size of a venue that you can reliably fill, and added value to smaller venues where the audience can see the star without binoculars. There is significant cost, and hence commercial risk, to putting on a large gig - and hence significant risk to over-charging for the tickets, not mentioning the long-term effect of having a half-empty theatre, or being perceived to be over-charging, on the star's reputation. That is real scarcity. Artificial scarcity would be only ever playing to a handful of millionaire fans...*

    The scalpers are siphoning off money while producing nothing and bringing no benefit to the market and taking on very little risk - if they wreck the concert by leaving the theatre half-empty, who cares? There are other artists out there... Yes, they have to buy the tickets, but since they sell them way over the face value, so what if they don't sell them all - and that's being generous and assuming that the capital didn't come from advance fees paid by suckers who answered "make $$$ in your spare time" ads...

    * Or trying to sell digital recordings at prices rooted in the days when they had to be expensively stamped out onto plastic discs in huge numbers and shipped around the world. Oh, wait...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday November 15 2017, @12:01AM (11 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 15 2017, @12:01AM (#597065) Journal

    and bringing no benefit to the market

    Such as having tickets for those who didn't get them at the initial release. That is the benefit of scalpers.

    I agree that there is market failure here due to the poor design of the market, but it is not solved by ignoring why scalpers exist in the first place.

    • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Wednesday November 15 2017, @09:32AM (8 children)

      by Wootery (2341) on Wednesday November 15 2017, @09:32AM (#597227)

      That is the benefit of scalpers.

      To who? All it does is replace early-buying fans by high-paying fans, with the scalpers pocketing the difference. It doesn't benefit the people behind the event itself, and it disadvantages the would-be early-buying-fan when the scalper gets in first.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday November 15 2017, @02:16PM (7 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 15 2017, @02:16PM (#597279) Journal

        All it does is replace early-buying fans by high-paying fans

        Ok, so why don't you think that is a benefit? High-paying fans who made last minute plans shouldn't be allowed to go to a concert? What you're willing to pay for a ticket is a strong indication of your desire for that ticket. My working example here is airline tickets which implements a system called dynamic pricing so that people who make last minute travel plans have travel options, but they pay for that with higher ticket prices.

        • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Wednesday November 15 2017, @05:06PM (5 children)

          by Wootery (2341) on Wednesday November 15 2017, @05:06PM (#597358)

          High-paying fans who made last minute plans shouldn't be allowed to go to a concert?

          It's zero-sum. I already asked you: where is the benefit in the high-paying fans being able to attend instead of early-buying (and possibly less wealthy) fans?

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday November 15 2017, @08:23PM (1 child)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 15 2017, @08:23PM (#597440) Journal

            where is the benefit in the high-paying fans being able to attend instead of early-buying (and possibly less wealthy) fans?

            They get tickets for things they want. And keep in mind that this whole mess started because early-buyers have access to all the tickets.

            • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Wednesday November 15 2017, @09:45PM

              by Wootery (2341) on Wednesday November 15 2017, @09:45PM (#597474)

              That doesn't answer the question. Again you're ignoring that it's zero-sum. There's no reason to favour high-paying late-comers over ordinary customers.

              There is no 'mess', there's just natural scarcity.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday November 15 2017, @08:37PM (2 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 15 2017, @08:37PM (#597445) Journal

            It's zero-sum.

            This a strong indication something is broken. The additional revenue from the people willing to pay more could either be used by the parties who are running the concert (band or venue) or given back to fellow concert goers in the form of cheaper tickets. It should not be zero-sum.

            • (Score: 2) by Wootery on Wednesday November 15 2017, @09:53PM (1 child)

              by Wootery (2341) on Wednesday November 15 2017, @09:53PM (#597479)

              Do you have a concrete scheme in mind?

              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 16 2017, @05:05AM

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 16 2017, @05:05AM (#597589) Journal
                Earlier, I mentioned embracing the scalpers by auctioning the tickets to a market and letting the speculators do whatever. If you happen to control the market, you can even charge transaction fees on the trading.

                Another approach is to do as the airlines do, dynamic pricing, where tickets increase in price as more are sold and the concert date approaches.
        • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Wednesday November 15 2017, @05:34PM

          by urza9814 (3954) on Wednesday November 15 2017, @05:34PM (#597370) Journal

          What you're willing to pay for a ticket is a strong indication of your desire for that ticket

          Now that's just complete bullshit. That would only be true in a world without any significant income inequality.

          Bill Gates could drop ten grand for tickets on a whim because it's Friday night and he's bored.

          Someone who earns $50k/year can't do that, no matter how badly they want to go.

          A better metric of how badly one wants to go is when they buy, not how much they pay. If you want the people who most want to go, look for the people that are *waiting* for that particular show, that are watching the band's website and social media pages waiting to see tour dates, who are willing to block out their calendar months in advance knowing that NOTHING could come up that's so important it would keep them from attending.

    • (Score: 2) by theluggage on Thursday November 16 2017, @09:39AM (1 child)

      by theluggage (1797) on Thursday November 16 2017, @09:39AM (#597627)

      Such as having tickets for those who didn't get them at the initial release.

      ... only because the fucking scalpers got them all first!.

      TFA is talking about 300 tickets bought up by just one scalper, who is unlikely to be the only one working that concert... Jeez, the self-justifying bullshit is beyond belief.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 16 2017, @02:01PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 16 2017, @02:01PM (#597690) Journal

        TFA is talking about 300 tickets bought up by just one scalper, who is unlikely to be the only one working that concert... Jeez, the self-justifying bullshit is beyond belief.

        Scalpers came first, then the manipulation of this market.