Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday November 16 2017, @06:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the its-the-way-that-you-do-it dept.

Questionable herpes vaccine research backed by tech heavyweight Peter Thiel may have jeopardized $15 million in federal research funding to Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. That's according to documents obtained by a Freedom of Information Act request by The State Journal Register.

In August, Kaiser Health News reported that Thiel and other conservative investors had contributed $7 million for the live-but-weakened herpes virus vaccine, developed by the late SIU researcher William Halford. The investments came after Halford and his private company, Rational Vaccines, had begun conducting small clinical trials in the Caribbean nation of St. Kitts and Nevis. With the off-shore location, Rational Vaccines' trial skirted federal regulations and standard safety protocols for human trials, including having approval and oversight from an institutional review board (IRB).

Experts were quick to call the unapproved trial "patently unethical," and researchers rejected the data from publication, calling the handling of safety issues "reckless." The government of St. Kitts opened an investigation into the trial and reported that health authorities there had been kept in the dark.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/11/university-could-lose-millions-from-unethical-research-backed-by-peter-thiel/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by tibman on Thursday November 16 2017, @06:46PM (2 children)

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 16 2017, @06:46PM (#597809)

    It would be bad to create an incentive to do unethical science. If "data is data" then strip all names (and credit) from the data.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DannyB on Thursday November 16 2017, @07:22PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 16 2017, @07:22PM (#597839) Journal

    If actual harm IS done, then be sure that names and credit for the harm IS or BECOMES associated with the data set.

    --
    People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.
    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by deimtee on Friday November 17 2017, @01:33AM

      by deimtee (3272) on Friday November 17 2017, @01:33AM (#598014) Journal

      No, data is data. If harm is done, then penalize the people who did the harm.
      You can even make the penalty so big that others are dissuaded from unethical research, but throwing out the data once you have it is making that harm worse by rendering it pointless.

      --
      If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.