Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday November 17 2017, @09:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the nobody-say-nothin' dept.

The Internet never forgets.

Google's general counsel has signalled the company intends to fight, hard, against broad interpretations of the European Union's right to be forgotten.

Kent Walker, the company's general counsel and senior veep, put his name to a strongly-worded post on Wednesday, US time. Titled "Defending access to lawful information at Europe's highest court", the post argued that forthcoming cases in the European Court of Justice "represent a serious assault on the public's right to access lawful information."

Walker wrote that French courts' request for a European Court of Justice ruling on personal data collection effectively seeks a regime under which "all mentions of criminality or political affiliation should automatically be purged from search results, without any consideration of public interest."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by Gaaark on Friday November 17 2017, @11:55AM (4 children)

    by Gaaark (41) on Friday November 17 2017, @11:55AM (#598141) Journal

    Oh look, a {} pretending it has free speech.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Touché=2, Total=5
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by LoRdTAW on Friday November 17 2017, @02:48PM (3 children)

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Friday November 17 2017, @02:48PM (#598192) Journal

    Oh look, a {} pretending it has free speech.

    I think you forgot to add elements to your tuple.

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday November 17 2017, @04:31PM (2 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 17 2017, @04:31PM (#598223) Journal

      Maybe it's not a tuple, but a set. Maybe it was the set of ancestor posts containing intelligence? Or some other set?

      The set of every set which does not contain itself as an element. That set would appear to qualify for inclusion in the set, thus making it a set which now includes itself, making it ineligible to appear within the set, which suddenly makes it eligible for delusion within the set , . . . etc turtles all the way down, stack does not overflow because we reset the stack pointer to re-write over the entire previous stack and into the heap, etc

      --
      To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
      • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday November 17 2017, @10:08PM (1 child)

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday November 17 2017, @10:08PM (#598416) Journal

        So, you're saying recursion is its own reward then? :)

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
        • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday November 20 2017, @02:58PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 20 2017, @02:58PM (#599247) Journal

          Insanity is its own reward.

          --
          To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.