Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Sunday November 19 2017, @06:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the It's-all-about-the-algorithms dept.

Facebook has a fake news problem. Google has an evil unicorn problem.

"Evil unicorns" — a term some Google engineers once coined, according to a former executive — are unverified posts on obscure topics, full of lies. They pop up from time to time on the web and find their way into Google's search results. In an ideal world, Google's search algorithm should force these fake, pernicious creatures so low in search results that they are buried deep in the web where few can find them.

Here's the problem: These unicorns — no, they've got nothing to do with highly valued startups — are designed to surface in a void. And after a breaking news event, like a mass shooting, there's scant verified information for Google's engine to promote. As Jonathan Swift once wrote, falsehood flies, and the truth comes limping after it.

[...] After the Oct. 1 Las Vegas shooting, several accounts seemed to coordinate an effort to smear Geary Danley, a man misidentified as the shooter, with false claims about his political ties. There were no existing web pages or videos broadcasting that Danley was innocent, and in the absence of verified information, Google's algorithms rewarded the lies, placing inaccurate tweets, videos and posts at the top of search results. A month later, when Devin Patrick Kelley shot and killed 26 people in Sutherland Springs, Texas, YouTube videos and tweets mislabeled him as "antifa," a term for radical, anti-fascist protesters. This was not true, yet Google displayed these posts prominently.

[...] This is a familiar headache for the company. For years, Google fought and won a similar battle with spammers, content farms and so-called search engine optimization experts over which web pages should be shown at the top of search results. But these latest web manipulators are causing greater havoc by targeting a slightly different part of Google — its real-time news and video results.

Source: Inside Google's Struggle to Filter Lies from Breaking News


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by aristarchus on Sunday November 19 2017, @08:55AM (8 children)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday November 19 2017, @08:55AM (#598883) Journal

    It says "aristarchus writes", and yet nothing of what I wrote is in the Fine Summerary? Might as just as well taken the Bloombarge piece and credited Takyon. SoylentNews has its own evil unicorns?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=2, Funny=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by takyon on Sunday November 19 2017, @09:52AM (5 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday November 19 2017, @09:52AM (#598890) Journal

    It says "aristarchus writes", and yet nothing of what I wrote is in the Fine Summerary?

    I'm guessing mrpg took a glance at it and used a simple yet effective algorithm to filter out the fake news.

    SoylentNews has its own evil unicorns?

    Or dark pegasi.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Sunday November 19 2017, @09:59AM (4 children)

      by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday November 19 2017, @09:59AM (#598893) Journal

      Oh, you particle of very little mass! You think evil unicorns are something to joke about? Well, just wait until one sneaks up behind you, when you are least suspecting it, and, BOOM! An entirely incorrect first impression will be made. So sad. Too bad. SoylentNews could have been something better.

      (and this just when Runaway posted profoundly correct ethical insight, and even khallow has something to say that was not wholely wrong! I was getting my hopes up, but now they are crushed, probably by a bot. )

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday November 19 2017, @01:57PM (2 children)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday November 19 2017, @01:57PM (#598919) Journal

        Are you or are you not a scion of Poseidon and Medusa?

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @08:17AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @08:17AM (#599185)

          scab maybe definitely not a scion

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 22 2017, @06:32AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 22 2017, @06:32AM (#600073)

            See! I told you that we need to keep the writing down to Runaway comprehension levels! No more high level vocabulary! And no references to Greek Mythology, unless it was in Clash of the Titans, the remake.

      • (Score: 2) by kazzie on Monday November 20 2017, @01:29PM

        by kazzie (5309) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 20 2017, @01:29PM (#599230)

        Well, just wait until one sneaks up behind you, when you are least suspecting it, and, BOOM! An entirely incorrect first impression will be made.

        Especially if that impression is made with the unicorn's horn!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 19 2017, @02:51PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 19 2017, @02:51PM (#598925)

    Your own, personal, flavor of witch hunting is just to much for the editors. They humor you to some extent, but your personal comments are just over the top. Or, under the bridge from whence you came, Troll.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @01:53AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 20 2017, @01:53AM (#599099)

      Was there witch hunting in the summary? Or are you just presuming?