Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday November 21 2017, @07:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the er-yes-no-maybe dept.

Speed cameras have been the focus of motorists' anger and frustration for years, although we are told repeatedly that they are an effective means of reducing death and injury on the roads. But is this really the case?

Whether speed cameras actually do save lives seems an easy assertion to test: measure the numbers of casualties at a site over a period, say two years; introduce a speed camera; re-measure the number of casualties over an equal period, and any reduction is due to the camera. But it's not really that simple. Many other factors are at play that might make cameras appear to be more effective than they really are. And these factors are often ignored when evaluating the performance of speed cameras at improving road safety.

Do speed cameras actually save lives?

[...] In road safety data, there is a general tendency for collision incidents at a site to reduce anyway following a short-term rise in their number, without any treatment (such as a speed camera) being applied. In statistics, this is known as regression-to-the-mean (or RTM). We also know that the long-term trend in collisions has generally been downward due to factors such as improved vehicle safety and better driver education[PDF].

So if we observe a reduction in casualties at a site following the installation of a camera, we need to ask how much of this reduction would have happened anyway (the RTM effect)? How much is due to general trends in road safety? And how much can we actually attribute to the camera itself?

[...] To make matters worse, half of the UK's fixed speed cameras may not even be turned on. So the situation is far from simple.

Methods to accurately account for RTM and trend often require knowledge of advanced statistics which may not always be available within a road safety team, and so it is likely that these confounding factors are not being considered consistently across the country.

[...] So, do speed cameras save lives? The answer is almost certainly yes, but probably not always to the extent that people are led to believe.

https://theconversation.com/do-speed-cameras-really-save-lives-87701


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by nobu_the_bard on Tuesday November 21 2017, @09:52PM (1 child)

    by nobu_the_bard (6373) on Tuesday November 21 2017, @09:52PM (#599898)

    They would prefer to create a more dangerous intersection to increase prophets.

    They're trying to manufacture martyrs! Which saint died on a zebra crossing again? Was it an important one?

    (Sorry this typo just amused me for some reason.)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by bob_super on Tuesday November 21 2017, @10:40PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday November 21 2017, @10:40PM (#599925)

    I think the Prophet is actually the one who sends the message that you shouldn't be here, by T-boning you with his pickup. The last words you hear from the Prophet will accompany your journey into the afterlife, yet your children will not understand the meaning of a "Monkey-fighting car in a Monday-to-Friday red light" until they have matured enough.

    Note that if stupid religious extremists want to be martyrs, we will not run out of the aforementioned type of prophet.