Given that collaboration [in science] is the norm, you may be asking yourself the eternal question: Who cares? How does the image of a lone scientist hero cause any danger to me?
The problem arises when there is a debate about a scientific topic. Following this structure, debate is a necessary and encouraged part of the scientific process. This debate happens before the idea is released to anyone outside of a few scientists and, while it can become heated at times, takes place with great respect between proponents of different viewpoints.
The danger can come when scientific results are released to the public. Our society now provides a platform for anyone to comment, regardless of his or her education, experience or even knowledge of the topic at hand.
While this is an excellent method of disseminating knowledge, it can also provide a platform for any opinion—regardless of the weight of data behind it—to be equal to that released in more traditional scientific ways.
Particularly in today's largely populist climate, people are looking to see the lone scientist hero overthrow the perceived dominance of facts coming from academia.
And herein lies the problem. In this situation, the opinion of a lone commenter may be considered on equal footing with that of tens or hundreds of people who have made the subject their life's work to ensure their interpretations are correct.
Everybody is entitled to their own scientific opinion, but everybody is not entitled to their own scientific facts?
(Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday November 22 2017, @01:59PM (4 children)
Looks like we have another John Titor [wikipedia.org] on our hands:
From a search for "noah 2028":
http://www.anongroup.org/time-traveller-2028/ [anongroup.org]
https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/881462/time-travel-2028-apocalypse-futuristic-life-aliens-end-of-the-world [express.co.uk]
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/661095/time-travel-proof-2028-paranormal-elite-youtube-noah-us-presidential-election-202-result [dailystar.co.uk]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Wednesday November 22 2017, @03:35PM (1 child)
Oh, this guy seems super legit. "Incumbent to win reelection" is such a bold and unlikely claim that time travel would be the simplest explanation for it coming true. VR, AI, and electric vehicles are all going to get better? I thought they'd get worse!
(Score: 1) by realDonaldTrump on Wednesday November 22 2017, @11:48PM
He doesn't say incumbent, he says Donald J. Trump. Very specific. youtu.be/ag8E-p4v_24 [youtu.be]
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Wednesday November 22 2017, @07:54PM (1 child)
Was his time machine based on the time cube?
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday November 22 2017, @08:17PM
My very favorite top notch lunacy :)
Excellent production value in the website.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.