SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the whom-do-you-trust...-and-why? dept.
Given that collaboration [in science] is the norm, you may be asking yourself the eternal question: Who cares? How does the image of a lone scientist hero cause any danger to me?
The problem arises when there is a debate about a scientific topic. Following this structure, debate is a necessary and encouraged part of the scientific process. This debate happens before the idea is released to anyone outside of a few scientists and, while it can become heated at times, takes place with great respect between proponents of different viewpoints.
The danger can come when scientific results are released to the public. Our society now provides a platform for anyone to comment, regardless of his or her education, experience or even knowledge of the topic at hand.
While this is an excellent method of disseminating knowledge, it can also provide a platform for any opinion—regardless of the weight of data behind it—to be equal to that released in more traditional scientific ways.
Particularly in today's largely populist climate, people are looking to see the lone scientist hero overthrow the perceived dominance of facts coming from academia.
And herein lies the problem. In this situation, the opinion of a lone commenter may be considered on equal footing with that of tens or hundreds of people who have made the subject their life's work to ensure their interpretations are correct.
Everybody is entitled to their own scientific opinion, but everybody is not entitled to their own scientific facts?
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 22 2017, @06:45PM
You don't know because you are an idiot. There are many, many things you do not know. Even more that you are aware of, but are incapable of comprehending. Get used to it. How about a nice conspiracy theory? You know, they laughed at me at the Royal Academy when first I presented my findings that the entire social media was composed of only two actual persons. Smart scientists like me, and an idiot that would be you. So, obviously I am correct, since I am a lone scientist, and I have an opinion that is at least as valid as anyone else's, and more valid than yours, since you are, by my theory, the idiot side of the internet universe. Go ahead, prove me wrong! History will vindicate me! You'll all pay for disrespecting me! Mouuhahahahaahaaaaa!!!!1!!!