An Oxford graduate's failure to get a top degree cost him a lucrative legal career, the High Court has heard.
Faiz Siddiqui alleges "inadequate" teaching on his modern history course resulted in him getting a low upper second degree in June 2000. He blames staff being absent on sabbatical leave and is suing the university for £1m. Oxford denies negligence and causation and says the case is "massively" outside the legal time limit.He said: "Whilst a 2:1 degree from Oxford might rightly seem like a tremendous achievement to most, it fell significantly short of Mr Siddiqui's expectations and was, to him, a huge disappointment."
Mr Mallalieu said his employment history in legal and tax roles was "frankly poor" and he was now unemployed, rather than having a career at the tax bar in England or a major US law firm. Mr Siddiqui also said his clinical depression and insomnia have been significantly exacerbated by his "inexplicable failure". Julian Milford, for Oxford University, told the court Mr Siddiqui complained about insufficient resources, but had only described the teaching as "a little bit dull".
Perhaps he might find employment with "This is Windows calling..."
(Score: 4, Interesting) by TheRaven on Thursday November 23 2017, @09:15AM (4 children)
sudo mod me up
(Score: 3, Informative) by FatPhil on Thursday November 23 2017, @04:45PM (3 children)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:14PM (2 children)
sudo mod me up
(Score: 3, Interesting) by AthanasiusKircher on Thursday November 23 2017, @11:23PM (1 child)
I'd be interested in this "research." Did they look at higher numbers of students? ...because "best" seems hard to define here, depending on your goals. I'm very familiar with the Oxbridge system, even though I never went there. And I knew the ideal there is often thought to be 1-3. But over the years I've done independent studies one-on-one with profs, and I've been in or taught classes with 3 students and up, with a lot of classes with between 3 and 8 students or so.
My personal experience as a student and then as an instructor is that the ideal number depends greatly on the number of students, but if I really want good discussion, 4-6 is actually my ideal number. Three or fewer can work, but it's still quite likely with 2 or 3 students to end up with a situation where the instructor is doing most of the talking. Just by the odds, by the time you get to 5 students or so, you're much more likely to get at least one "talker" in your group, who will spur on discussion and participation with the others. Two or three can get very awkward -- much more so than one-on-one -- unless the personalities mesh well and the supervisor can figure out how to make the dynamic work well consistently. Obviously, though, the more students you add in, the harder it becomes to ensure all are on-task and learning everything. But it's still generally pretty hard to "hide" in a group of 5 or so.
(Score: 2) by TheRaven on Friday November 24 2017, @11:05AM
sudo mod me up