SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Spotted at Lobsters is a thread about a stackoverflow question on man; why does running "man -w" report "gimme gimme gimme" when run at 00:30?
This gets this response:
Pretty much the whole story is in the commit. The maintainer of man is a good friend of mine, and one day six years ago I jokingly said to him that if you invoke man after midnight it should print "gimme gimme gimme", because of the Abba song called "Gimme gimme gimme a man after midnight":
Well, he did actually put it in. A few people were amused to discover it, and we mostly forgot about it until today.
The commit in question, and more commentary over at HackerNews.
Anyone know of other good easter eggs that have cropped up unexpectedly and caught users out?
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Why "man -w" will Sometimes Print "gimme gimme gimme"
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 70 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I don't want a pickle,
I just wanna ride on my motorsickle.
And I don't want to die,
I just want to ride on my motorcy.
Cle.
-- Arlo Guthrie
(Score: 4, Funny) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday November 22 2017, @08:10PM (42 children)
Yeah, stuff like this will help people see that Linux is an option for professional computing and not just a hobby for a bunch of nerds...
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 5, Touché) by Rosco P. Coltrane on Wednesday November 22 2017, @08:13PM (8 children)
Linux is just trying to look as professional as Microsoft [wikipedia.org]...
(Score: 2) by EvilSS on Wednesday November 22 2017, @08:23PM (4 children)
(Score: 5, Insightful) by MostCynical on Wednesday November 22 2017, @08:30PM
Sad, that flight simulator was the best bit of Excel.
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 4, Touché) by SomeGuy on Wednesday November 22 2017, @09:17PM
I hear there are some rotten easter eggs in Microsoft's Windows telemetry code, but you will never be allowed to see them.
Trustworthy, riiiiight.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday November 22 2017, @09:39PM (1 child)
I don't think the Blue Screen was removed until Vista, long after 2002.
Blue Scream of Death is an easter egg, isn't it?
To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 22 2017, @10:50PM
It's still there, but you have to disable the automatic restart to see the BSOD.
(Score: 3, Touché) by DannyB on Wednesday November 22 2017, @09:35PM (2 children)
Microsoft trying to look professional? Remember that Windows XP had the PlaySkool theme by default.
To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
(Score: 2) by edIII on Wednesday November 22 2017, @11:55PM (1 child)
I think I may literally be the only guy that liked it. I dunno why, but I like it, and some days, miss running Windows XP. The rolling hills were calming :)
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:06PM
I like it too, it reminds me of Teletubbies.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Arik on Wednesday November 22 2017, @08:50PM (20 children)
Then you can shove it, we don't need it.
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
(Score: 3, Insightful) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday November 22 2017, @09:50PM (19 children)
No, it means no inconsistent behaviour.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Wednesday November 22 2017, @11:37PM (10 children)
But the behaviour of Easter eggs is consistent. The Easter egg is consistently triggered under the exact same conditions each time.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @09:26AM (9 children)
In contrast stuff like the Excel flight simulator was unlikely to be triggered by accident when using features as documented.
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @09:44AM (3 children)
No, man -w didn't stop working as documented.
Using man -w [pagename] continued to work exactly the same as before.
Using man -w without a pagename didn't stop working as documented either, because that would imply that before it would have worked as documented, which in turn would imply that this usage had been documented at all. As a general rule, undocumented behaviour may change at any time.
Here's an excerpt of the man page of man:
Note that all forms using the -w option have a non-optional argument.
Also note that there's no documentation of what error messages it may spit out; since "gimme gimme gimme" was output on stderr, it was a (admittedly not very instructive) error message. And it does spit out error messages other than "gimme gimme gimme"; those error messages are unspecified (and also locale dependent by the way). And while I'm too lazy to search through the repository, I would bet that some error messages changed over time.
So no, man -w didn't stop working as documented.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:10PM (1 child)
That's not what my man says:
-w or --path
Don’t actually display the man pages, but do print the loca-
tion(s) of the files that would be formatted or displayed. If no
argument is given: display (on stdout) the list of directories
that is searched by man for man pages. If manpath is a link to
man, then "manpath" is equivalent to "man --path".
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday November 24 2017, @07:22AM
Well, what actually matters is what the man which contained the Easter egg says. Elsethread I've quoted that, directly from the repository. It doesn't allow -w without argument.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:26PM
Further to my previous comment: what you've quoted there is from a version of man somewhere between 7 and 16 years old.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by Arik on Thursday November 23 2017, @10:17AM (4 children)
Did not.
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:21PM (3 children)
Did too.
-w or --path
Don’t actually display the man pages, but do print the loca-
tion(s) of the files that would be formatted or displayed. If no
argument is given: display (on stdout) the list of directories
that is searched by man for man pages. If manpath is a link to
man, then "manpath" is equivalent to "man --path".
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:56PM (2 children)
That's not what it says on my system:
Checked on 3 different versions of Linux (all Debian/Ubuntu based, though).
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Thursday November 23 2017, @07:09PM (1 child)
Well, I now decided to look in the source: [nongnu.org]
Note that this is from the very repository in which the Easter egg was added.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @10:05PM
Things are a bit confusing because there are at least two different implementations of man in common use today on GNU/Linux systems.
The subject of this article is man-db [nongnu.org], a reimplementation of the older "man" (whose website has been down for some time now but it is archived here [archive.org] -- I'm not sure if anyone has taken over from this)
There are several differences, including (apparently) the documentation of the -w option. The part quoted by wonkey_money is from the classic "man" version.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @02:51AM
Well, we all know that Linus Torvalds is a prime example of consistent behavior.
(Score: 2) by Arik on Thursday November 23 2017, @09:40AM (6 children)
Inconsistent with the documentation? Well, no. The documentation specifies only using man -w with a manpage. You have to omit the manpage to get this, if you're relying on the documentation you wouldn't expect that to do anything but throw an error.
Which is exactly what it does. The 'easter egg' goes to sterr. So even the scripts are happy.
So what's it inconsistent with? What possible reason is there to object to this beyond being a sad humorless control freak that doesn't like to be reminded that other people have wit and sometimes even a little fun while working?
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @01:40PM
Well, if you look at the Stack Exchange post, apparently it broke some test case.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:24PM (4 children)
The documentation you land on if you Google "man man page" might only specify -w with an argument, but that page is 7 years old.
-w or --path
Don’t actually display the man pages, but do print the loca-
tion(s) of the files that would be formatted or displayed. If no
argument is given: display (on stdout) the list of directories
that is searched by man for man pages. If manpath is a link to
man, then "manpath" is equivalent to "man --path".
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by Arik on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:43PM (3 children)
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @10:09PM
The quoted snippet above is from the manual of the classic "man" package, not from "man-db" which is the subject of this article. In classic "man" the -w option is clearly documented to work without any additional arguments.
Completely pointless incompatibilities between the two implementations is probably not a desirable scenario for anyone.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @10:44PM (1 child)
Why do you assume the documentation was changed in error? Can't it have been a deliberate change to the functionality of the program?
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by Arik on Friday November 24 2017, @04:19AM
It's actually consistent with the documentation you quoted, regardless of when it was changed, they're still consistent.
This is because the doc specifies the output to stdout, and that's exactly what you get on stdout.
The 'easter egg' doesn't print to stdout, it prints to stderr.
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
(Score: 1) by ataradov on Wednesday November 22 2017, @10:12PM (3 children)
Just like flight simulator in Excel?
(Score: 3, Touché) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday November 22 2017, @10:56PM (2 children)
No, not exactly like it, because Excel doesn't behave differently when you use a documented command at a certain time of day.
But, since you mentioned it:
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @01:42PM (1 child)
Emphasis by me:
Nor does man.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:12PM
-w or --path
Don’t actually display the man pages, but do print the loca-
tion(s) of the files that would be formatted or displayed. If no
argument is given: display (on stdout) the list of directories
that is searched by man for man pages. If manpath is a link to
man, then "manpath" is equivalent to "man --path".
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 5, Insightful) by sjames on Wednesday November 22 2017, @10:31PM (4 children)
Many professional products contain easter eggs and other humor. In the case of mathematics textbooks, it well predates computers.
I recall Corel Draw (for Windows) had an easter egg where you could control the burner on a little hot air balloon with the mouse button.
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Wednesday November 22 2017, @11:00PM (3 children)
An easter egg shouldn't hijack a documented switch at a certain time of day. And "everyone else does it" isn't a great excuse, anyway. Microsoft saw fit to ban them in the name of "Trustworthy Computing."
Lovely. Not so lovely if undocumented/unexpected code turns out have an exploitable bug in it, of course.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @08:48AM (1 child)
Apparently the documented behavior of that switch is to print "missing argument" - though that never actually worked.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 23 2017, @09:43AM
man -w
/usr/local/man:/usr/local/share/man:/usr/share/man
And this is what the documentation says it is supposed to do:
-w, --where, --path, --location
Don't actually display the manual pages, but do print the loca‐
tion(s) of the source nroff files that would be formatted.
It doesn't say it's supposed to output "gimme gimme gimme" when run sometime after midnight.
(Score: 2) by sjames on Thursday November 23 2017, @11:36PM
I fail to see the harm. It does perform it's documented behavior. The funny output is on stderr, so an automated script won't trip over it. It doesn't mess with the return code.
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Thursday November 23 2017, @05:46PM (2 children)
Sorry, convince who? You realize that 90% of the world runs on linux right?
(Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday November 23 2017, @06:19PM (1 child)
90% of the world's computers might - though I don't know what that number truly represents or where you got it from - but desktop share is single figures.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Friday November 24 2017, @07:17PM
40% of end users are running linux. Next is 36% with windows
Server side it's about 2 in 3 linux - https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/operating_system/all [w3techs.com]
Supercomputer wise it's 100%