SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Video game gambling schemes known as "loot boxes" or "loot crates" could be banned or restricted by regulators:
We learned last week that Belgium's gambling authority was investigating loot crates in Star Wars Battlefront II over concerns that they constitute gambling. Now, the decision is in, and the answer is a resounding yes, according to Dutch-language publication VTM Nieuws. The commission claims that purchasable add-on boxes, the contents of which are randomized, mix "money and addiction" and thus are a form of gambling.
Belgian Minister of Justice Koen Geens added: "Mixing gambling and gaming, especially at a young age, is dangerous for the mental health of the child." The commission will now reportedly work through the European Union's process to execute a total ban. We've reached out to Belgium's Gaming Commission for more details on its next steps and the legal implications of the ruling.
The country isn't alone in its stance on loot boxes. Just hours ago, Rep. Chris Lee (D) from Hawaii denounced EA's "predatory behavior" in a speech uploaded to YouTube (first spotted by Kotaku). In the clip, Lee also talks of the detrimental affect micro-transactions have on children, with specific reference to Battlefront II, which he describes as a a "Star Wars-themed online casino, designed to lure kids into spending money".
What Are Loot Boxes? Gaming's Big New Problem, Explained
Press 'F' to pay respects.
Related: Why Call of Duty WW2 Bosses Won't 'Shy Away' from History
Star Wars Game in U-Turn After Player Anger
(Score: 5, Insightful) by vux984 on Thursday November 23 2017, @11:55PM
"Vote with your feet, and run away from these games, instead of ranting here where NOBODY from the game devs will ever see it."
'instead' ? I do both.
I am not currently playing anything with lootboxes, and I actively avoid games that have them. But my leaving doesn't affect the developers -- they're making money from the people who are sucked in by it. They never cared about me. They're happy to fleece the suckers for dozens or hundreds or thousands of dollars. On some level, I agree with the whole 'personal responsibility' 'free market' and so forth line of arguments... but really, at the same time you can't reasonably expect 12 year old child to come out on top versus a big corporation backed by massive investment in behavioural science, and a product development cycle designed to make the product as addictive as possible.