Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday November 24 2017, @06:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the beary-important-news dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

A boatload of tourists in the far eastern Russian Arctic thought they were seeing clumps of ice on the shore, before the jaw-dropping realisation that some 200 polar bears were roaming on the mountain slope.

"It was a completely unique situation," said Alexander Gruzdev, director of the Wrangel Island nature reserve where the encounter in September happened. "We were all gobsmacked, to be honest."

The bears had come to feast on the carcass of a bowhead whale that washed ashore, later resting around the food source. The crowd included many families, including two mothers trailed by a rare four cubs each, Gruzdev told AFP.

Climate change means ice, where polar bears are most at home, is melting earlier in the year and so polar bears have to spend longer on land, scientists say.

This might wow tourists but means the bears, more crammed together on coasts and islands, will eventually face greater competition for the little food there is on land.

Locals are also at risk from hungry animals venturing into villages.

Wrangel Island, off the coast of Russia's Chukotka in the northeast, is where polar bears rest after ice melts in early-August until November, when they can leave land to hunt for seals.

It is also considered the birthing centre for the species, with the highest density of maternity dens in the entire Arctic, Gruzdev said.

"A whale is a real gift for them," he said. "An adult whale is several tens of tonnes" that many bears can feed on for several months.

Studies have shown that, compared with 20 years ago, polar bears now spend on average a month longer on Wrangel Island because "ice is melting earlier and the ice-free period is longer," said Eric Regehr, from the University of Washington, the lead American scientist on the US-Russian collaborative study of Wrangel Island polar bears.

Changing ice conditions could also be responsible for the increasing number of bears flocking there, Regehr said.

This autumn, the number of bears observed was 589, far exceeding previous estimates of 200-300, he said, calling it "anomalously high".

[...] "We cannot stop climate change, but we can sort out the situation on the shore and make life easier for the bears," he said, referring to measures such as bear patrols to minimise conflict with humans.

"With changes in nature, that has to be attended to."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 24 2017, @09:51PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 24 2017, @09:51PM (#601155)

    I'm against climate change because I have the "dad remote detection of thermostat change" gene. But climate change happens regardless of whether I like it or not.

    Now the concept of climate change due to human activity is so completely saturated in fraud that even if there's truth in that concept somewhere, it's proven impossible for me to find under the mountain of lies and data manipulation. Anyone wanting to use "man-made climate change" as an excuse to force me to do or not do something can insert themselves up their own rectums.

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 24 2017, @11:55PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 24 2017, @11:55PM (#601189)

    it's proven impossible for me to find under the mountain of lies and data manipulation

    Turn off Faux News and you won't have that problem. It's kind of hard to find the truth in the bullshit when you've hooked up a pipe spewing bullshit at 500 gallons per minute.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @09:05AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @09:05AM (#601329)

      If you believe Fox News is the sole source of manipulated mainstream news, then I've got a bridge to sell you, buddy.

      If you believe ANYthing you hear in the mainstream news because you heard it from the mainstream news, I still think you'd be interested in buying my bridge. If CNN/MSNBC/Faux/NYT/ad nauseum said the sun would rise in the east tomorrow, I'd go double-check it on principle.